Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 10, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Congestive heart failure incidence and prognosis: case identification using central adjudication versus hospital
Gina D Schellenbaum1, Susan R Heckbert, Nicholas L Smith
1Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98101, and Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, MN, USA. ginas@u.washington.edu
Insights
Hospital discharge diagnoses may overestimate congestive heart failure (CHF) incidence in older adults. Mortality rates following CHF onset appear similar across diagnostic methods, but higher if both are used.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Epidemiology
- Geriatrics
Background:
- Accurate estimation of congestive heart failure (CHF) incidence and prognosis is crucial for public health and clinical practice.
- Hospital discharge diagnoses are commonly used for epidemiological studies but may lack diagnostic precision.
- Central adjudication by expert committees offers a more rigorous method for confirming medical events.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the incidence and prognosis of hospitalized congestive heart failure (CHF) using hospital discharge diagnoses versus central adjudication.
- To evaluate the impact of different diagnostic methods on mortality estimates in elderly CHF patients.
Main Methods:
- Utilized the Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS) cohort of 5888 elderly adults.
- CHF events were confirmed through physician committee adjudication, including clinical signs, symptoms, tests, and therapy.
- Hospitalized CHF cases (n=1209) were identified using ICD-9 codes for discharge diagnoses or central adjudication.
Main Results:
- Incidence rates for hospitalized CHF were higher with discharge diagnoses (24.6/1000 person-years) compared to central adjudication (17.1/1000 person-years).
- Mortality rates were lower for patients identified by only one method (discharge diagnosis HR=0.77; adjudication HR=0.72) versus both.
- The findings suggest potential overestimation of CHF incidence using discharge diagnoses alone.
Conclusions:
- Studies relying solely on hospital discharge diagnoses may overestimate incident hospitalized congestive heart failure (CHF) in the elderly population.
- Mortality following CHF onset may be comparable whether diagnosed by discharge diagnosis or central adjudication.
- Combining both diagnostic methods may lead to higher observed mortality rates.
Purpose:
We compared hospitalized congestive heart failure (CHF) incidence and prognosis estimates using hospital discharge diagnoses or central adjudication.
Methods:
We used the Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS), a population-based cohort study of 5888 elderly adults. A physician committee adjudicated potential CHF events, confirmed by signs, symptoms, clinical tests, and/or medical therapy. A CHF discharge diagnosis included any of these ICD-9 codes in any position: 428, 425, 398.91, 402.01, 402.11, 402.91, and 997.1. We constructed an inception cohort of 1209 hospitalized, nonfatal, incident CHF cases, identified by discharge diagnosis, adjudication, or both.
Results:
Incidence rates for hospitalized CHF were 24.6 per 1000 person-years using discharge diagnoses and 17.1 per 1000 person-years using central adjudication. Compared to the group identified as having CHF by both methods, the group with only a discharge diagnosis (hazard ratio=0.77, 95% confidence interval=0.65-0.91) and the group with central adjudication only (hazard ratio=0.72, 95% confidence interval=0.55-0.94) had lower mortality rates.
Conclusions:
In the elderly, studies using only discharge diagnoses, as compared to central adjudication, may estimate higher rates of incident hospitalized CHF. Mortality following CHF onset may be similar for these methods and higher if both methods are used together.
More Related Videos
04:05Clinical Application of Phase Angle and BIVA Z-Score Analyses in Patients Admitted to an Emergency Department with Acute Heart Failure
Published on: June 30, 2023
05:16Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
Published on: June 10, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care