Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A structural perspective of CTD function.

Anton Meinhart1, Tomislav Kamenski, Sabine Hoeppner

  • 1Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Gene Center, University of Munich (LMU), 81377 Munich, Germany.

Genes & Development
|June 21, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Mechanism of co-transcriptional cap snatching by influenza polymerase.

Nature·2026
Same author

Structural basis for substrate recruitment and catalytic ubiquitin transfer by the E2/E3 hybrid enzyme UBE2O.

The Journal of biological chemistry·2025
Same author

Cross-species interactome analysis uncovers a conserved selective autophagy mechanism for protein quality control in plants.

Developmental cell·2025
Same author

Molecular mechanism of co-transcriptional H3K36 methylation by SETD2.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Architecture of the UBR4 complex, a giant E4 ligase central to eukaryotic protein quality control.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2025
Same author

A split-site E3 ligase mechanism enables ZNFX1 to ubiquitinate and cluster single-stranded RNA into ubiquitin-coated nucleoprotein particles.

Cell·2025
Same journal

Corrigendum: Inhibition of Myc family proteins eradicates KRas-driven lung cancer in mice.

Genes & development·2026
Same journal

A new perspective on ATR's role in translesion synthesis.

Genes & development·2026
Same journal

Mechanisms coordinating exit from the stem cell state in mammals.

Genes & development·2026
Same journal

Evolutionarily conserved spliceosome-exosome pathway in nuclear mRNA surveillance.

Genes & development·2026
Same journal

CDK1 and CEP97 cooperatively control centriole length to orchestrate ciliogenesis and developmental patterning.

Genes & development·2026
Same journal

Coupling of translesion synthesis with the replisome stabilized at stalled replication forks by ATR.

Genes & development·2026
See all related articles

The C-terminal domain (CTD) of RNA polymerase II (Pol II) coordinates mRNA production by interacting with specific phosphorylation patterns. Understanding how proteins recognize these patterns and how CTD-modifying enzymes achieve specificity is key to deciphering transcription regulation.

Area of Science:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Gene Expression Regulation
  • Biochemistry

Background:

  • The C-terminal domain (CTD) of RNA polymerase II (Pol II) is a crucial platform for integrating nuclear events related to mRNA biogenesis.
  • CTD-binding proteins interact with specific phosphorylation patterns on the CTD, which dynamically change during the transcription cycle.
  • These dynamic changes are orchestrated by CTD-modifying enzymes, including kinases and phosphatases.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To elucidate the mechanisms by which CTD-binding and CTD-modifying proteins function.
  • To understand how proteins recognize specific CTD phosphorylation patterns.
  • To investigate the basis for the substrate specificity of CTD-modifying enzymes.

Main Methods:

  • Structural studies of CTD-binding proteins.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Functional analyses of CTD-modifying enzymes (kinases and phosphatases).
  • Biochemical assays to probe protein-CTD interactions.

    • Main Results:

    • Proteins recognize CTD phosphorylation patterns through direct contact with phosphorylated residues or indirectly without direct phosphate contact.
    • The catalytic mechanisms of CTD kinases and phosphatases have been elucidated.
    • The structural basis for CTD specificity of these enzymes remains an open question.

    Conclusions:

    • CTD phosphorylation patterns serve as a code recognized by specific proteins to regulate mRNA biogenesis.
    • While the catalytic functions of CTD-modifying enzymes are understood, their specificity mechanisms require further investigation.
    • Further research into CTD enzyme specificity will enhance our understanding of gene transcription regulation.