Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Current status of proteomic standards development.

Sandra Orchard1, Chris Taylor, Henning Hermjakob

  • 1EMBL Outstation, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Trust, Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK. orchard@ebi.ac.uk

Expert Review of Proteomics
|June 22, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Feasibility study of a smartphone app to monitor systemic sclerosis-related digital ulcers-a potential new tool for remote clinical monitoring.

Rheumatology advances in practice·2026
Same author

The Potential of Digital Twins for Pediatric Rare Diseases.

CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology·2026
Same author

From FAIR to CURE: guidelines for computational models of biological systems.

NPJ systems biology and applications·2026
Same author

The 2025 Westlake Autumn Symposium for Al Proteomics and Virtual Cell.

Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics·2026
Same author

Heart Healthy Ohio Initiative: A Statewide Cooperative to Improve Cardiovascular Risk.

Journal of general internal medicine·2026
Same author

Oligomers mediate the spatial transmission of Aβ peptide aggregation.

Communications chemistry·2026
Same journal

Unveiling the post translational modification code in Alzheimer's pathogenesis: crosstalk between phosphorylation and acetylation.

Expert review of proteomics·2026
Same journal

Plasma proteome profiles of standard-risk and high-risk childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Expert review of proteomics·2026
Same journal

Potential proteomic biomarkers for monitoring clinical studies in Duchenne/Becker muscular dystrophy.

Expert review of proteomics·2026
Same journal

Proteomics-based approaches to neutrophil biology.

Expert review of proteomics·2026
Same journal

Deciphering mitochondrial metabolic vulnerabilities in ovarian clear cell carcinoma with mass spectrometry-based clinical proteomics.

Expert review of proteomics·2026
Same journal

The proteomic origin of the genetic code.

Expert review of proteomics·2026
See all related articles

High-throughput proteomic data generation requires standardized methods for accurate description and exchange. The Minimum Information About a Proteomic Experiment (MIAPE) data model facilitates this, enabling seamless data sharing between researchers and repositories.

Area of Science:

  • Proteomics
  • Bioinformatics
  • Data Science

Background:

  • Increasingly high-throughput proteomic data generation necessitates robust methods for data description, storage, and exchange.
  • Complexity in proteomic technologies and experimental designs highlights the need for standardized data handling.
  • The Human Proteome Organization's Proteome Standards Initiative has been instrumental in developing these standards.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address the growing need for standardized methods in describing, storing, and exchanging complex proteomic data.
  • To introduce the Minimum Information About a Proteomic Experiment (MIAPE) data model as a foundational standard.
  • To facilitate data exchange through specific interchange formats like mzData and the eXtensible Mark-up Language-MI (XML-MI).

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Development of the Minimum Information About a Proteomic Experiment (MIAPE) data model.
  • Incorporation of specific interchange formats, such as mzData for mass spectrometry data.
  • Adoption of the eXtensible Mark-up Language-MI (XML-MI) format for molecular interaction data exchange.

Main Results:

  • Establishment of foundational standards for describing proteomic experimental design and facilitating data exchange.
  • Publication of the MIAPE data model, defining the scope and purpose of proteomics experiments.
  • Development and publication of interchange formats like mzData and XML-MI, with major databases adopting XML-MI for data downloads.

Conclusions:

  • Standardized data models and interchange formats are crucial for managing high-throughput proteomic data.
  • The MIAPE model and associated formats (mzData, XML-MI) provide a framework for accurate data description and exchange.
  • Widespread adoption by databases signifies the practical utility and importance of these standards in the proteomics field.