Will nanotechnology make the world a better place?

Area of Science:

• Societal impact of emerging technologies
• Science, technology, and society studies

Background:

• Nanotechnology promises significant societal innovation.
• Societal acceptance hinges on institutional agendas and public perception.
• Lessons from genetically modified organisms highlight the importance of institutional behavior.

Purpose of the Study:

• To analyze the factors influencing public acceptance of nanotechnology.
• To propose a shift in nanotechnology research priorities.

Main Methods:

• Literature review and analysis of socio-political factors.
• Comparative analysis with the genetically modified organism debate.

Main Results:

• Public acceptability is significantly influenced by institutional context and agendas, not solely technical risks.
• Current research priorities may not align with public concerns or societal preferences.

Conclusions:

• Shifting research priorities towards environmental and health protection is crucial for public support.
• Ongoing sensitivity to societal preferences is necessary for responsible nanotechnology development.