Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

Magnetically-Assisted Remote Controlled Microcatheter Tip Deflection under Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published on: April 4, 2013
Independent medical examinations: an expanding source of physician liability
1Wiggin and Dana LLP, New Haven, Connecticut 06510, USA. kbaum@wiggin.com
Abstract:
Employers frequently ask physicians to conduct medical examinations and review radiology films and other diagnostic tests of employees. Physicians also provide such services at the request of other third parties. These examinations are commonly called independent medical examinations. Increasingly, patients are bringing and prevailing in medical malpractice lawsuits against physicians who conduct independent medical examinations, in part because of physicians' misconceptions of their legal duties in this context. Despite the absence of a traditional physician-patient relationship, physicians who conduct independent medical examinations still owe various legal duties to the examinee patient, although the precise scope of those duties is a source of constant debate and change. Since 2001 alone, 4 state supreme courts have exercised their discretion to hear cases on this issue, bearing witness to its medical, legal, and social significance. Given the current medical malpractice climate, it is imperative that physicians understand the potential liability inherent in conducting independent medical examinations. This article summarizes controlling law, clarifying an otherwise muddied legal picture. It also offers practical suggestions for limiting physician liability in independent medical examinations.
Insights
Physicians conducting independent medical examinations (IMEs) face malpractice risks due to misunderstood legal duties. Understanding these duties is crucial for physicians to limit liability in these non-traditional patient encounters.
Area of Science:
- Medical Law
- Physician Liability
- Independent Medical Examinations
Background:
- Physicians often perform independent medical examinations (IMEs) for employers or third parties.
- These examinations are increasingly subject to medical malpractice lawsuits.
- Physicians may misunderstand their legal duties in the context of IMEs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To clarify the legal duties physicians owe to patients during independent medical examinations.
- To inform physicians about potential liability risks associated with IMEs.
- To provide practical strategies for mitigating physician liability in IME cases.
Main Methods:
- Review of controlling legal precedents and state supreme court decisions.
- Analysis of the evolving scope of physician duties in IME contexts.
- Synthesis of legal principles to address physician misconceptions.
Main Results:
- Despite the lack of a traditional physician-patient relationship, physicians owe specific legal duties to examinees.
- The scope of these duties is subject to ongoing legal interpretation and change.
- Recent court cases highlight the significance and complexity of IME-related liability.
Conclusions:
- Physicians must understand their legal obligations when conducting independent medical examinations.
- Awareness of potential liability is critical in the current medical malpractice environment.
- Adherence to clarified legal standards can help physicians limit exposure to malpractice claims.
Related Concept Videos
Nurses' Legal Responsibilities I
The legal responsibilities of a nurse regarding informed consent include the following:
Nurses' Legal Responsibilities II
Communication between nurses and...
Nurses' Legal Responsibilities III
Cultivating a culture of collaboration and mutual respect among nurses transcends mere enhancement...
Torts I
Intentional...
Torts II
Torts III
Quasi-intentional torts in healthcare involve acts where intent is not directed to harm an individual but results in harm due to careless or reckless speech.

