[Metal or plastic endoprostheses in malignant obstructive jaundice. A randomized and prospective comparison]

In a prospective randomized trial 58 patients (24 men, 34 women, mean age 67 +/- 13 [42-89] years) with inoperable malignant jaundice were treated with synthetic (S; n = 29) or expanding metal endoprostheses (M; n = 29). After endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography patients were divided into a group with hilar (K: n = 7; M: n = 6) or distal involvement (K: n = 22, M: n = 23). In two cases with hilar involvement (28%) a synthetic endoprosthesis could not be implanted, while early prosthesis occlusion (after 2 days) was observed in one case. But in this group it was possible to implant all metal stents. In the group with distal involvement both synthetic and metal endoprostheses were successfully implanted. In the M group the proportion of patients with prosthesis failure (13.6%) was significantly higher than in the S subgroup (40.9%). The cholangitis incidence was 9% in the M group, significantly less (P less than 0.05) than in the K group (40.9%). Duration of hospital stay to treat prosthesis-related complications was significantly less in the M group (average 2.9 days) than the K group (12.9 days). It would be a great advance in palliative tumour treatment if it were possible significantly to reduce, by means of metal stents, the incidence of late cholangitis and the duration of hospital stay necessary to treat late complications. But improvement in the technique of implanting metal stents would be essential before their general use in distal lesions can be recommended.