Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 17, 2026

Reduction in Left Ventricular Wall Stress and Improvement in Function in Failing Hearts using Algisyl-LVR
Published on: April 8, 2013
Rationale for the use of angiotensin II receptor blockers in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (part I of
T Barry Levine1, Arlene B Levine
1Division of Cardiology, Allegheny General Hospital, 320 East North Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15212-4772, USA. blevine@wpahs.org
Insights
Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) offer a promising alternative for heart failure (HF) patients, potentially improving outcomes where ACE inhibitors fall short. ARBs provide more complete renin-angiotensin system blockade and are better tolerated, addressing limitations of current HF therapies.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Chronic heart failure (HF) affects nearly 5 million US individuals, with increasing prevalence.
- Standard HF treatments like ACE inhibitors and beta blockers reduce morbidity and mortality but have limitations.
- Unacceptable morbidity and mortality rates persist despite current therapies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the clinical effects of Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers (ARBs) in patients with heart failure (HF).
- To address limitations of ACE inhibitors, including intolerance (e.g., cough) and incomplete renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockade.
- To explore ARBs' potential for more complete RAS blockade via receptor-level interference.
Main Methods:
- Clinical trials were reviewed to assess the efficacy of ARBs in HF patients.
- Comparison of ARBs with ACE inhibitors regarding tolerability and mechanism of action.
- Evaluation of ARBs' impact on HF symptoms and function.
Main Results:
- ARBs may achieve more complete RAS blockade than ACE inhibitors.
- ARBs are better tolerated than ACE inhibitors, with fewer adverse effects like cough.
- Clinical trials indicate ARBs improve symptoms and function in HF patients.
Conclusions:
- ARBs present a strong rationale for use in heart failure management.
- They offer an alternative for patients intolerant to ACE inhibitors.
- ARBs may provide superior RAS blockade and improved clinical outcomes in HF.
Abstract:
Almost 5 million individuals in the United States are diagnosed with chronic heart failure (HF), and the prevalence is increasing. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and beta blockers, neurohormonal antagonists that block the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) and the sympathetic nervous system, respectively, have been shown in clinical trials to reduce morbidity and mortality in patients with HF, and these therapies are now integral components of standard HF treatment. Yet, morbidity and mortality rates in HF remain unacceptably high, and the limitations of current standard therapies are becoming increasingly apparent. About 10% of patients with HF are unable to tolerate ACE inhibitors, often because of cough. In addition, ACE inhibition may not completely block the RAS because angiotensin II, the main end product of the RAS, can be generated via non-ACE enzymatic pathways. Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) may exert more complete RAS blockade than ACE inhibitors by interfering with the binding of angiotensin II at the receptor level, regardless of the enzymatic pathway of production. They are also better tolerated than ACE inhibitors and have been shown to improve symptoms and function in clinical trials in patients with HF. These factors provide a strong rationale for the study of the clinical effects of ARBs in patients with HF.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Antihypertensive Drugs: Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Heart Failure Drugs: β-Blockers
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology