Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

How much liver resection is too much?

Emma J Mullin1, Matthew S Metcalfe, Guy J Maddern

  • 1University of Adelaide, Department of Surgery, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, South Australia 5011, Australia.

American Journal of Surgery
|June 24, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Non-technical Errors, a Hidden Contributor to Patient Mortality in Emergency General Surgery: A National Retrospective Cohort Study.

Annals of surgery·2026
Same author

Extended validation of the mesh integration (MINT) index: a 1-year porcine study.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same author

Surgical Conflicts of Interest: Are They a Problem?

ANZ journal of surgery·2026
Same author

Aortocoronary Versus Composite Grafting Strategies in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: a Network Meta-analysis.

The Canadian journal of cardiology·2026
Same author

Potentially Preventable Mortality After Elective Colorectal Cancer Surgery: Insights From a National Surgical Mortality Audit.

ANZ journal of surgery·2026
Same author

Tale of Two Centres-Exploring Bedside Challenges to Implementing a Clinical Quality Registry for Abdominal Wall Hernias in Metropolitan Australia.

ANZ journal of surgery·2026
Same journal

Innovative management of Anterior Cutaneous Nerve Entrapment Syndrome (ACNES): A meta-analysis and introduction of a new robotic approach with patient-based algorithm.

American journal of surgery·2026
Same journal

Does the risk outweigh the benefit? Clot progression, recanalization & complications of anticoagulation therapy in acute pancreatitis with concomitant splanchnic vein thrombosis.

American journal of surgery·2026
Same journal

High and low body mass index and 90-day postoperative outcomes in patients with Crohn's disease undergoing abdominal surgery.

American journal of surgery·2026
Same journal

Women with firearm injuries: A multicenter mixed-methods study.

American journal of surgery·2026
Same journal

SBAS presidential address: A surgeon-scientist's journey from haptic science to digital performance metrics.

American journal of surgery·2026
Same journal

Using Dr. Google and AI to stay informed.

American journal of surgery·2026
See all related articles

Assessing liver function reserve before liver resection is crucial for surgical success. While various methods exist, no single test definitively determines safe resection limits, highlighting the need for comprehensive risk assessment.

Area of Science:

  • Hepatology
  • Surgical Oncology
  • Medical Diagnostics

Background:

  • Post-hepatectomy liver failure presents a poor prognosis and is a significant surgical concern.
  • Insufficient functional reserve in remaining liver tissue can lead to decreased function, impaired regeneration, and liver failure.
  • Numerous methods have been developed to quantify the liver's functional reserve.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review methods for assessing hepatic reserve in hepatectomy patients.
  • To discuss the application of these methods in surgical decision-making.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature on hepatic reserve assessment techniques.
  • Analysis of scoring systems, metabolic pathway tests, and radiological methods.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • A variety of methods, including Child-Pugh classification, metabolic tests, and radiological assessments, are available to quantify liver functional reserve.
  • No single method has emerged as universally superior for dictating safe liver resection limits.

Conclusions:

  • Residual liver function assessment is valuable for routine risk stratification, aiding informed patient consent and surgical planning.
  • Currently, no single test is conclusively superior for assessing hepatic reserve in hepatectomy patients.