Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Temporal modulation transfer functions in patients with cochlear implants.

R V Shannon1

  • 1House Ear Institute, Los Angeles, California 90057.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
|April 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evoked cortical activity and speech recognition as a function of the number of simulated cochlear implant channels.

Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology·2009
Same author

Sending sound to the brain.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2002
Same author

Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2001
Same author

Brainstem electronic implants for bilateral anacusis following surgical removal of cerebello pontine angle lesions.

Otolaryngologic clinics of North America·2001
Same author

Effects of electrode location on speech recognition with the Nucleus-22 cochlear implant.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2000
Same author

Effects of dynamic range and amplitude mapping on phoneme recognition in Nucleus-22 cochlear implant users.

Ear and hearing·2000
Same journal

High-resolution depth estimation for multiple wideband sources in deep sea via sparse Bayesian learninga).

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Depression markers in speech: An approach based on tract variables dynamics.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

The oyster toadfish (Opsanus tau) alters active and diurnal calling amid vessel noise in New York City.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Experimental noise characterisation of phase-locked tandem-rotor in edgewise flight.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

The tune-text-temporal synergy: Prosodic effects of final segmental weakening in Neapolitan.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Monitoring vessel movement above critical offshore infrastructure using distributed acoustic sensing.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
See all related articles

Cochlear implant patients show low-pass filter characteristics in detecting temporal modulation, with best sensitivity between 80-100 Hz. This suggests speech envelope information may be conveyed even for high-frequency stimuli.

Area of Science:

  • Auditory Neuroscience
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Signal Processing

Background:

  • Cochlear implants (CIs) aim to restore hearing by electrically stimulating the auditory nerve.
  • Understanding temporal processing in CI users is crucial for optimizing speech perception.
  • Amplitude modulation (AM) detection is a key aspect of temporal processing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To measure amplitude modulation detection thresholds in cochlear implant patients across different modulation frequencies.
  • To compare temporal modulation transfer functions (TMTFs) between normal-hearing and CI listeners.
  • To investigate the relationship between AM detection, current waveform detection, and beat detection in CI users.

Main Methods:

  • Measured detection thresholds for amplitude modulation, low-frequency sinusoidal currents, and two-tone complex beats.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Calculated temporal modulation transfer functions (TMTFs) for each task.
  • Compared TMTFs between normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant patients.

    • Main Results:

    • All three tasks exhibited low-pass filter characteristics in their TMTFs.
    • CI listeners had a cutoff frequency around 140 Hz, while normal-hearing listeners had around 70 Hz.
    • CI users showed peak sensitivity to modulation frequencies between 80-100 Hz and could detect smaller modulation amplitudes at high carrier levels.

    Conclusions:

    • A common temporal processing mechanism likely underlies AM detection, current waveform detection, and beat detection in CI users.
    • CI listeners' temporal processing, while different from normal-hearing listeners, shares similar low-pass characteristics.
    • Speech envelope information from high-frequency components may be conveyed to CI users, despite limitations in steady-state, high-frequency stimulus discrimination.