Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Pairwise multiple comparison adjustment in survival analysis.

Brent R Logan1, Hong Wang, Mei-Jie Zhang

  • 1Division of Biostatistics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, 53226-0509, USA. blogan@mcw.edu

Statistics in Medicine
|June 25, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Donor-Specific Transplant Outcomes from BMTCTN 1702: A Multi-Center Prospective Biological-Assignment Trial.

Blood advances·2026
Same author

TITE-safety: a robust time-to-event safety monitoring approach for clinical trials.

Biometrics·2026
Same author

Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Access and Patient Diversity.

JAMA network open·2026
Same author

Differential effects of two common GVHD prophylaxis regimens on the gut microbiome: Results from the BMT CTN 1801 study.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

The BIOPREVENT machine-learning algorithm predicts chronic graft-versus-host disease and mortality risk using posttransplant biomarkers.

The Journal of clinical investigation·2026
Same author

Neurodevelopmental outcomes following hematopoietic cell transplantation for patients with severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID): A PIDTC study.

Journal of human immunity·2026
Same journal

Interpretable Bayesian Modeling for Multireader Multicase Studies: Addressing Overdispersion and Limited Sample Size in Diagnostic Enhancement Evaluation.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Adaptive Sequential Multiple Hypotheses Testing for Concomitant Vaccine Safety Surveillance.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Novel Distance Regression for Repeated Outcomes With Missing Data: Applications to Longitudinal and Crossover Studies of Microbiome Beta-Diversity.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Optimal Weighted Tests for Replication Studies and the 'Two-Trials Rule' With Multiple Hypotheses.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Identifiable Copula-Double-Cox Models: A Fully Parametric Framework for Dependent Right-Censored Survival Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Moving From Individualized Risk-Based Prevention to Benefit-Based Prevention: Estimating Individualized Life-Years Gained From Prevention Services as a Basis for Eligibility.

Statistics in medicine·2026
See all related articles

This study addresses inflated false significance in survival analysis when comparing multiple groups. It investigates methods to adjust for numerous comparisons, enhancing the reliability of survival curve findings.

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trials
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • Clinical studies frequently analyze time-to-event data, such as patient survival.
  • Comparing survival curves across multiple treatment or prognostic groups is common.
  • Performing numerous pairwise comparisons inflates the risk of false positive findings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate statistical methods for adjusting survival analysis when multiple group comparisons are performed.
  • To mitigate the inflated Type I error rate associated with multiple pairwise comparisons in survival data.
  • To improve the accuracy of significance testing in comparative survival studies.

Main Methods:

  • The study explores adjustment methods for survival analysis concerning the number of comparisons.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Methods were applied to a retrospective bone marrow transplant study.
  • A simulation study was conducted to compare the power of different adjustment techniques.

    • Main Results:

    • The investigated methods provide adjustments for multiple comparisons in survival analysis.
    • Application to a bone marrow transplant registry dataset demonstrated practical utility.
    • Simulation results indicated varying power levels for detecting true survival differences.

    Conclusions:

    • Adjusting survival analysis for multiple comparisons is crucial for accurate interpretation of group differences.
    • The proposed methods offer a way to control false significance in comparative survival studies.
    • Further research and validation of these adjustment techniques are warranted for clinical application.