Related Experiment Videos
Novel treatments for autistic spectrum disorders
1Children's Seashore House, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, 1914, USA. Levys@email.chop.edu
Summary
Complementary and alternative medical therapies (CAM) for autistic spectrum disorders (ASD) are controversial. Evidence shows many CAM treatments lack efficacy and can have side effects, necessitating well-designed studies for informed clinical choices.
Area of Science:
- Developmental Pediatrics
- Autism Spectrum Disorders Research
Background:
- Autistic spectrum disorders (ASD) present significant treatment controversies in developmental pediatrics.
- Complementary and alternative medical therapies (CAM) are frequently chosen by families seeking root-cause treatments for ASD.
- CAM interventions for ASD are categorized by proposed mechanisms, including immune modulation, gastrointestinal support, neurotransmitter supplements, and non-biologic approaches.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine the rationale, evidence of efficacy, and side effects of various CAM therapies used for autism.
- To provide a critical review of CAM treatments for ASD, highlighting the need for robust clinical evidence.
- To discuss the example of secretin therapy, illustrating the rapid adoption and subsequent lack of evidence for certain ASD treatments.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing literature on CAM therapies for autism spectrum disorders.
- Analysis of proposed mechanisms of action for different CAM categories.
- Case study examination of secretin therapy for autism.
Main Results:
- Many CAM therapies for ASD lack substantiation from well-designed clinical studies.
- The proposed mechanisms for behavioral effects of some CAM therapies, like secretin, were not supported by clinical evidence.
- Evidence for the efficacy of numerous CAM interventions for ASD remains limited or absent.
Conclusions:
- Families and clinicians require access to high-quality, well-designed clinical evidence to make informed decisions about ASD therapies.
- The perceived benefits of many CAM therapies for autism are not supported by scientific validation.
- Further rigorous research is essential to guide the selection of effective and safe treatments for children with ASD.