Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 17, 2026

Manufacturing Abdominal Aorta Hydrogel Tissue-Mimicking Phantoms for Ultrasound Elastography Validation
Published on: September 19, 2018
Does the clinical evaluation of the cardiac status predict outcome in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms?
K Lachapelle1, A M Graham, J F Symes
1Department of Surgery, Royal Victoria Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Insights
Identifying high-risk patients for cardiac death before abdominal aortic aneurysm repair significantly reduces mortality. A targeted cardiac evaluation strategy proved cost-effective and improved patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Vascular Surgery
- Cardiac Risk Assessment
Background:
- Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair carries significant perioperative risks.
- Cardiac complications are a leading cause of mortality after AAA repair.
- Cost-effective strategies are needed to optimize patient selection for cardiac evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate a cost-effective method for reducing mortality after asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.
- To stratify patients into risk groups based on clinical evaluation for targeted cardiac work-up.
- To assess the impact of a risk-stratified approach on cardiac mortality and morbidity.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 146 patients undergoing asymptomatic AAA repair (1986-1990).
- Patients categorized into three groups based on cardiac history, angina, heart failure, and ECG findings.
- Group I: No cardiac history/ischemia. Group II: Mild-moderate cardiac history/ischemia. Group III: Severe heart failure/angina.
Main Results:
- Overall mortality was 4.8%; cardiac mortality was 3.4%.
- Group I (low risk) had 1.8% mortality with no cardiac deaths.
- Group II (intermediate risk) had 9.5% mortality (8% cardiac), significantly higher than Group I (p=0.02).
- Group III (high risk) had no deaths.
- Postoperative cardiac morbidity (MI, CHF, tachyarrhythmias) was significantly lower in Group I compared to Group II.
Conclusions:
- A clinical evaluation-based risk stratification effectively identifies patients at risk for cardiac death after AAA repair.
- Targeted cardiac work-up for high-risk patients is a cost-effective strategy to reduce perioperative mortality.
- This approach minimizes unnecessary cardiac investigations in low-risk patients.
Abstract:
A cost-effective method to reduce mortality rates after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair centers on selecting and investigating only those patients at risk for cardiac-related death. All 146 patients undergoing asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysm repair over a 5-year period (1986 to 1990) were retrospectively placed into one of the three following groups on the basis of a clinical evaluation. Group I: no history of myocardial infarction or angina, no congestive heart failure, and no ischemic changes on electrocardiogram (ECG). Group II: history of myocardial infarction or class I-II angina or ischemic changes on ECG. Group III: presence of congestive heart failure or class III-IV angina. Patients in group I had no further cardiac work-up; patients in group II with angina had left ventricular ejection fraction assessment by multiple gated acquisition (all greater than 37%) and were cleared for operation by a cardiologist; patients in group II without angina had no further cardiac work-up; patients in group III had coronary angiography and then coronary revascularization. The overall mortality rate was 4.8%, with a cardiac mortality rate of 3.4%. The mortality rate in group I (n = 64) was 1.8%, with no cardiac-related deaths; the mortality rate in group II (n = 63) was 9.5% (8% cardiac-related deaths). No deaths occurred in group III (n = 19). The difference between the cardiac mortality rates in groups I and II was significant (p = 0.02) as was the postoperative cardiac morbidity: total myocardial infarctions (p less than 0.001); congestive heart failure (p = 0.02); tachyarrhythmias (p = 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Atherosclerosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Tests
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care

