Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

On the structural differences between markers and genomic AC microsatellites.

Fabio Pardi, Richard M Sibly, M J Wilkinson

    Journal of Molecular Evolution
    |June 29, 2005
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Human genetics suggests differing causal pathways from HMGCR inhibition to coronary artery disease and type 2 diabetes.

    International journal of epidemiology·2026
    Same author

    Leveraging large-scale biobanks for therapeutic target discovery.

    HGG advances·2025
    Same author

    Algorithms to reconstruct past indels: The deletion-only parsimony problem.

    PLoS computational biology·2025
    Same author

    A computational framework for defining and validating reproducible phenotyping algorithms of 313 diseases in the UK Biobank.

    Scientific reports·2025
    Same author

    Link between the Birth-Death Process and the Kingman Coalescent-Applications to Phylogenetic Epidemiology.

    Systematic biology·2025
    Same author

    Times needed to evolve mating cues under allopatry and parapatry.

    Journal of evolutionary biology·2025

    Genetic markers (AC microsatellites) differ structurally from genomic AC microsatellites, impacting mutation rate studies. Understanding these differences is crucial for accurate population biology and genetic research.

    Area of Science:

    • Genetics
    • Molecular Biology
    • Population Biology

    Background:

    • AC microsatellites are valuable genetic markers.
    • Mutation rates of microsatellites are critical for population biology.
    • Inconsistencies exist between marker-based and non-marker-based mutation studies.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • Investigate structural differences between marker and genomic AC microsatellites.
    • Determine if these differences explain inconsistencies in mutation rate studies.
    • Propose a unified model for microsatellite mutational mechanisms.

    Main Methods:

    • Comparative analysis of CEPH AC marker microsatellites and genomic AC microsatellites.
    • Assessment of microsatellite length, repeat segment concentration, and interruptions.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of base composition in flanking sequences.

    • Main Results:

    • Marker AC microsatellites are longer than genomic counterparts.
    • Markers have fewer interruptions and longer repeat segments.
    • Marker flanking regions show higher G/C and lower A/T content.
    • Significant structural and compositional differences exist between marker and genomic microsatellites.

    Conclusions:

    • Structural and compositional disparities between marker and genomic microsatellites likely affect mutation rates.
    • Current models may not fully account for these differences.
    • A unified model is needed to reconcile marker-derived and genomic observations for accurate mutation rate inference.