Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 17, 2026

Deficient Pms2, ERCC1, Ku86, CcOI in Field Defects During Progression to Colon Cancer
Published on: July 28, 2010
Differential response to DNA damage may explain different cancer susceptibility between small and large intestine
Mee Young Hong1, Nancy D Turner, Raymond J Carroll
1Department of Nutrition and Food Science, Texas A&M University, TX 77843-2253, USA.
Abstract:
Although large intestine (LI) cancer is the second-leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States, small intestine (SI) cancer is relatively rare. Because oxidative DNA damage is one possible initiator of tumorigenesis, we investigated if the SI is protected against cancer because of a more appropriate response to oxidative DNA damage compared with the LI. Sixty rats were allocated to three treatment groups: 3% dextran sodium sulfate (DSS, a DNA-oxidizing agent) for 48 hrs, withdrawal (DSS for 48 hrs + DSS withdrawal for 48 hrs), or control (no DSS). The SI, compared with the LI, showed greater oxidative DNA damage (P < 0.001) as determined using a quantitative immunohistochemical analysis of 8-oxodeoxyguanosine (8-oxodG). The response to the DNA adducts in the SI was greater than in the LI. The increase of TdT-mediated dUTP-biotin nick end labeling (TUNEL)-positive apoptosis after DSS treatment was greater in the SI compared with the LI (P < 0.001), and there was a positive correlation (P = 0.031) between DNA damage and apoptosis in the SI. Morphologically, DSS caused an extensive loss of crypt structure shown in lower crypt height (P = 0.006) and the number of intact crypts (P = 0.0001) in the LI, but not in the SI. These data suggest that the SI may be more protected against cancer by having a more dynamic response to oxidative damage that maintains crypt morphology, whereas the response of the LI makes it more susceptible to loss of crypt architecture. These differential responses to oxidative DNA damage may contribute to the difference in cancer susceptibility between these two anatomic sites of the intestine.
Insights
The small intestine shows greater DNA damage and apoptosis response than the large intestine, suggesting better protection against cancer by maintaining crypt structure.
Area of Science:
- Gastroenterology
- Oncology
- Molecular Biology
Background:
- Large intestine (LI) cancer is a leading cause of cancer deaths, while small intestine (SI) cancer is rare.
- Oxidative DNA damage is a potential initiator of tumorigenesis.
- Differential susceptibility to cancer between SI and LI suggests distinct responses to DNA damage.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if the SI is protected against cancer due to a more effective response to oxidative DNA damage compared to the LI.
- To compare the cellular and morphological responses to oxidative stress between the SI and LI.
Main Methods:
- Sixty rats were divided into three groups: dextran sodium sulfate (DSS) exposure, DSS withdrawal, and control.
- Oxidative DNA damage was quantified using 8-oxodeoxyguanosine (8-oxodG) immunohistochemistry.
- Apoptosis was assessed via TdT-mediated dUTP-biotin nick end labeling (TUNEL) assay.
- Morphological changes in crypt structure were analyzed.
Main Results:
- The SI exhibited significantly greater oxidative DNA damage (8-oxodG) than the LI.
- Apoptosis (TUNEL-positive cells) was significantly higher in the SI compared to the LI after DSS treatment.
- A positive correlation was found between DNA damage and apoptosis in the SI.
- DSS induced significant loss of crypt structure in the LI but not in the SI.
Conclusions:
- The SI demonstrates a more dynamic response to oxidative DNA damage, preserving crypt morphology and potentially offering greater cancer protection.
- The LI's response to oxidative damage leads to crypt architectural disruption, increasing susceptibility to cancer.
- Differential responses to oxidative stress may explain the observed differences in cancer incidence between the SI and LI.
Related Concept Videos
Cancers Originate from Somatic Mutations in a Single Cell
Nucleotide Excision Repair
Cells are regularly exposed to mutagens—factors in the environment that can damage DNA and generate mutations. UV radiation is one of the most common mutagens and is estimated to introduce a significant number of changes in DNA. These include bends or kinks in the structure, which can block DNA replication or transcription. If these errors are not fixed, the damage can cause mutations, which in turn can result in cancer or disease depending on which sequences are...
Nucleotide Excision Repair
Mismatch Repair
The Mutator Protein Family Plays a Key Role in DNA Mismatch Repair
The human genome has more than 3 billion base pairs of DNA per cell. Prior to cell division, that vast amount of genetic...
Mismatch Repair
Adaptive Mechanisms in Cancer Cells
Some of the advantages that cancer cells have on normal cells include - enhanced ability to divide without terminally differentiating, induce new blood vessel formation,...
