Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

DNA Base Pairing02:27

DNA Base Pairing

33.6K
Erwin Chargaff’s rules on DNA equivalence paved the way for the discovery of base pairing in DNA. Chargaff’s rules state that in a double-stranded DNA molecule,
33.6K
DNA Base Pairing02:27

DNA Base Pairing

32.9K
No description available
32.9K
Weighted Mean00:57

Weighted Mean

6.4K
While taking the arithmetic, geometric, or harmonic mean of a sample data set, equal importance is assigned to all the data points. However, all the values may not always be equally important in some data sets. An intrinsic bias might make it more important to give more weightage to specific values over others.
For example, consider the number of goals scored in the matches of a tournament. While computing the average number of goals scored in the tournament, it may be more important to...
6.4K
Sign Test for Matched Pairs01:17

Sign Test for Matched Pairs

419
The sign test for matched pairs offers a robust method for comparing two paired samples, often for the effects of an intervention in one of them. This method is very useful in situations where the underlying distribution of the data is unknown. The test compares two related samples—often pre- and post-treatment measurements on the same subjects—to determine if there are significant differences in their median values.
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in...
419
VSEPR Theory and the Effect of Lone Pairs04:01

VSEPR Theory and the Effect of Lone Pairs

53.2K
Effect of Lone Pairs of Electrons on Molecule Geometry
53.2K
Atomic Weight01:25

Atomic Weight

13.8K
Protons and neutrons have approximately the same mass, about 1.67 × 10-24 grams. Scientists arbitrarily define this amount of mass as one atomic mass unit (amu) or one Dalton. Electrons are much smaller in mass than protons, weighing only 9.11 × 10-28 grams, or about 1/1800 of an atomic mass unit. As a result, they do not contribute much to an element's overall atomic mass. This means that, when considering atomic mass, it is customary to ignore the mass of any electrons and...
13.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

In Reply.

Deutsches Arzteblatt international·2026
Same author

Interpretation of Pharmacometabolomics Results: Fingerprint of Drug Exposure or Confounder Effects? Insights from a Urinary Metabolomics Study with Voriconazole in Healthy Participants.

International journal of molecular sciences·2026
Same author

The phenotypic spectrum and genetic determinants of severe spinal muscular atrophy in individuals with a single <i>SMN2</i> copy: an international retrospective observational study.

EClinicalMedicine·2026
Same author

Urinary Metabolomics Predict Acute Kidney Injury in Very-Low-Birth-Weight Infants with Patent Ductus Arteriosus.

Biomolecules·2026
Same author

Confidence Intervals for Comparing Two Independent Folded Normals: A Case Study in Bunion Surgery.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same author

Emulated Effects of Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonist Therapy in the General Population.

Journal of the American College of Cardiology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 8, 2026

Methods of Pairing and Pair Maintenance of New Zealand White Rabbits Oryctolagus Cuniculus Via Behavioral Ethogram, Monitoring, and Interventions
10:00

Methods of Pairing and Pair Maintenance of New Zealand White Rabbits Oryctolagus Cuniculus Via Behavioral Ethogram, Monitoring, and Interventions

Published on: March 16, 2018

14.9K

Weighting affected sib pairs by marker informativity.

Daniel Franke1, Andreas Ziegler

  • 1Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, University at Lubeck, Lubeck, Germany.

American Journal of Human Genetics
|June 30, 2005
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a new weighted mean test for affected sib pair (ASP) analysis, improving statistical power in genomewide scans by accounting for marker informativity. The novel method demonstrates superior performance compared to classical tests, especially with low marker informativity.

More Related Videos

Identification of Kinase-substrate Pairs Using High Throughput Screening
11:13

Identification of Kinase-substrate Pairs Using High Throughput Screening

Published on: August 29, 2015

8.6K
Using Informational Connectivity to Measure the Synchronous Emergence of fMRI Multi-voxel Information Across Time
07:12

Using Informational Connectivity to Measure the Synchronous Emergence of fMRI Multi-voxel Information Across Time

Published on: July 1, 2014

12.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 8, 2026

Methods of Pairing and Pair Maintenance of New Zealand White Rabbits Oryctolagus Cuniculus Via Behavioral Ethogram, Monitoring, and Interventions
10:00

Methods of Pairing and Pair Maintenance of New Zealand White Rabbits Oryctolagus Cuniculus Via Behavioral Ethogram, Monitoring, and Interventions

Published on: March 16, 2018

14.9K
Identification of Kinase-substrate Pairs Using High Throughput Screening
11:13

Identification of Kinase-substrate Pairs Using High Throughput Screening

Published on: August 29, 2015

8.6K
Using Informational Connectivity to Measure the Synchronous Emergence of fMRI Multi-voxel Information Across Time
07:12

Using Informational Connectivity to Measure the Synchronous Emergence of fMRI Multi-voxel Information Across Time

Published on: July 1, 2014

12.7K

Area of Science:

  • Genetics
  • Statistical genetics
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Affected sib pair (ASP) analysis is crucial for genomewide scans using microsatellite markers.
  • Classical test statistics may not fully leverage sample power due to incomplete ASP informativity.
  • Weighting by informativity has been shown to increase statistical power in linkage and association studies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Introduce a novel class of tests for ASPs based on the mean test, weighted by marker informativity.
  • Develop a Monte Carlo simulation approach for evaluating significance in ASP analyses.
  • Enhance the power of genomewide scans by accounting for family-specific marker informativity.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a weighted mean test by inversely weighting families proportional to their marker informativity, using de Finetti representation.
  • Derived the limiting distribution of the weighted mean test and validated its statistical properties.
  • Proposed and validated a Monte Carlo simulation approach for significance evaluation of both classical and weighted mean tests.

Main Results:

  • The weighted mean test demonstrated significantly higher statistical power than the classical mean test, particularly in scenarios with low marker informativity.
  • The proposed Monte Carlo simulation approach was validated for both classical and weighted mean tests.
  • Reanalysis of two published datasets showed the weighted mean test achieved a 0.6 higher maximum LOD score compared to the classical mean test.

Conclusions:

  • The weighted mean test offers a powerful enhancement for affected sib pair analysis in genomewide scans.
  • Accounting for marker informativity is essential for maximizing statistical power in genetic studies.
  • The developed methods provide robust tools for genetic linkage and association studies.