Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Protecting the vulnerable in brain research.

R M Cook-Deegan1

  • 1Kennedy Institute of Ethics, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.

Cerebrum : the Dana Forum on Brain Science
|July 1, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Privacy, families, and human subject protections: some lessons from pedigree research.

The Journal of continuing education in the health professions·2002
Same author

Intellectual property. Patents, secrecy, and DNA.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2001
Same author

Inner sanctum.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·1999
Same author

Alzheimer testing at Silver Years.

Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees·1998
Same author

Insulin gene patent litigation.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·1998
Same author

Ownership of human genes.

Nature·1996
Same journal

A Perfect Storm.

Cerebrum : the Dana forum on brain science·2022
Same journal

Managing Pain.

Cerebrum : the Dana forum on brain science·2022
Same journal

Imaging's Groundbreaking Discovery: 30 Years Later.

Cerebrum : the Dana forum on brain science·2022
Same journal

Poverty and Developing Brain.

Cerebrum : the Dana forum on brain science·2022
Same journal

Interoception: The Secret Ingredient.

Cerebrum : the Dana forum on brain science·2021
Same journal

His and Hers: Sex Differences in the Brain.

Cerebrum : the Dana forum on brain science·2021
See all related articles

New policies are needed for clinical brain research participation to avoid conflicts of interest. Despite complexities, common ground exists to resolve policy stalemates and protect participants.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Bioethics
  • Health Policy

Background:

  • Clinical brain research faces challenges in policy development.
  • Unresolved conflicts of interest can harm research participants.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine new policy approaches for clinical brain research participation.
  • To identify principles for resolving policy stalemates and conflicts of interest.

Main Methods:

  • Policy analysis of current attempts to regulate clinical brain research.
  • Ethical review of participant involvement in neuroscience studies.

Main Results:

  • Complex issues surround participation in clinical brain research.
  • Ample common ground exists for policy development.
Keywords:
Biomedical and Behavioral ResearchLegal ApproachMental Health Therapies

Related Experiment Videos

Conclusions:

  • Workable policies are achievable through collaboration.
  • Recommended principles can help end costly policy stalemates in brain research.