Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Visual scanning with or without spatial uncertainty and divided and selective attention.

Y Liu1, C D Wickens

  • 1University of Illinois, Urbana.

Acta Psychologica
|March 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary

Visual scanning interferes more with spatial tasks than verbal tasks. Spatial uncertainty during scanning significantly increases this interference, impacting divided attention research.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Dual-task performance and the hick-hyman law of choice reaction time.

Journal of motor behavior·2013
Same author

Attentional filtering in the design of electronic map displays: a comparison of color coding, intensity coding, and decluttering techniques.

Human factors·2002
Same author

Display signaling in augmented reality: effects of cue reliability and image realism on attention allocation and trust calibration.

Human factors·2002
Same author

A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation.

IEEE transactions on systems, man, and cybernetics. Part A, Systems and humans : a publication of the IEEE Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Society·2002
Same author

Pathway HUDs: are they viable?

Human factors·2001
Same author

Superimposition, symbology, visual attention, and the head-up display.

Human factors·2001

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Human Attention Studies

Background:

  • Theories of selective attention and divided attention offer different explanations for attentional processes.
  • Understanding task interference is crucial for differentiating these attentional theories.
  • Visual scanning, a key selective attention process, involves sequential and spatial exploration.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the relationship between selective and divided attention theories.
  • To examine task interference patterns between visual scanning and concurrent spatial or verbal tasks.
  • To determine the role of spatial uncertainty in visual scanning's interference effects.

Main Methods:

  • An experiment was designed to measure task interference.
  • Participants performed a primary tracking task concurrently with secondary spatial or verbal decision tasks.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Information for decision tasks was presented with or without spatial uncertainty.

    • Main Results:

    • Visual scanning, as a spatial exploratory activity, caused greater interference with concurrent spatial tasks compared to verbal tasks.
    • Spatial uncertainty during visual scanning was identified as the critical factor for this differential interference effect.
    • The findings support a distinction between visual scanning with and without spatial uncertainty.

    Conclusions:

    • Visual scanning's interference patterns provide evidence for integrating selective and divided attention theories.
    • Spatial uncertainty is a key moderator of attentional resource allocation during complex tasks.
    • This research clarifies the specific mechanisms underlying attentional interference in visual processing.