Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Checkpoint responses to replication fork barriers.

Sarah Lambert1, Antony M Carr

  • 1Genome Damage and Stability Centre, University of Sussex, Brighton, BN1 9RQ, UK.

Biochimie
|July 2, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

DNA2 enables growth by restricting recombination-restarted replication.

Nature·2025
Same author

Leveraging NSQIPP testicular torsion process measures: Initial survey of the NSQIPP testicular torsion collaborative.

Journal of pediatric urology·2025
Same author

TopBP1 coordinates DNA repair synthesis in mitosis via recruitment of the nuclease scaffold SLX4.

Communications biology·2025
Same author

Retrospective Assessment of Endometriosis Pain Over the Life Course: A Reliability Study Within the ComPaRe-Endometriosis Cohort.

European journal of pain (London, England)·2025
Same author

SUMO protease and proteasome recruitment at the nuclear periphery differently affect replication dynamics at arrested forks.

Nucleic acids research·2024
Same author

Disordered regions and folded modules in CAF-1 promote histone deposition in <i>Schizosaccharomyces pombe</i>.

eLife·2024
Same journal

Differential cardiac microRNA expression in anoxic Trachemys scripta elegans turtles.

Biochimie·2026
Same journal

Renal failure-driven luminal ammonia production impairs gut barrier function in CKD.

Biochimie·2026
Same journal

Conditional Knockout of Indoleamine 2, 3-Dioxygenase-1 in Osteoprogenitor Cells in Mice Results in Sex-dependent Differences in Bone Mass.

Biochimie·2026
Same journal

Sedentariness disrupts, while exercise restores, thermogenic and metabolic plasticity in inguinal adipose tissue of mice.

Biochimie·2026
Same journal

Chrononutrition as a modulator of retinal metabolic resilience: A translational framework linking circadian biology to ocular disease.

Biochimie·2026
Same journal

Heterologous expression, purification, and biophysical characterisation of the cobalt-dependent nitrile hydratase from Rhodococcus rhodochrous ATCC BAA-870.

Biochimie·2026
See all related articles

DNA replication fork stability is crucial for genome integrity. Recombination proteins are recruited to collapsed, but not stalled, forks, highlighting their role in eukaryotic DNA repair and fork stabilization.

Area of Science:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Genetics
  • Cell Biology

Background:

  • DNA replication fidelity is essential for maintaining genome integrity.
  • Perturbed replication forks trigger cellular pathways for stabilization and problem resolution.
  • Unresolved issues can lead to fork collapse, exposing DNA ends for processing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review different types of replication fork barriers (RFBs).
  • To discuss how RFBs create distinct DNA structures at stalled forks.
  • To examine the role of DNA replication checkpoints, particularly the intra-S phase checkpoint, in stabilizing stalled forks.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of DNA replication, fork collapse, and checkpoint mechanisms.
  • Analysis of existing research on recombination proteins at replication forks.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussion of DNA structure formation at stalled replication forks.

    • Main Results:

    • Replication fork collapse in prokaryotes activates recombination proteins.
    • Eukaryotic cells recruit recombination proteins to collapsed, but not stalled, replication forks.
    • Distinct RFBs lead to varied DNA structures at stalled forks.

    Conclusions:

    • Recombination is integral to replication fork maintenance in eukaryotes.
    • DNA replication checkpoints, especially the intra-S phase checkpoint, are vital for stabilizing stalled forks.
    • Understanding RFB responses is key to comprehending genome stability mechanisms.