Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Rethinking scientific specialization.

K Brad Wray

    Social Studies of Science
    |July 5, 2005
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Scientific specialization arises not just from social factors, but also from conceptual shifts. This study highlights how conceptual changes drove the emergence of new scientific fields like endocrinology and virology.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Early host defense against virus infections.

    Cell reports·2024
    Same author

    The geopolitics of book publishing and book reviews.

    Metascience·2021
    Same author

    Meditations on ….

    Metascience·2021
    Same author

    Five years… and still going.

    Metascience·2020
    Same author

    Detecting errors that result in retractions.

    Social studies of science·2019
    Same author

    A new twist to the No Miracles Argument for the success of science.

    Studies in history and philosophy of science·2018
    Same journal

    Making Microplastics Matter: Classification, Politics and the Lives of Microplastics as Environmental Objects.

    Social studies of science·2026
    Same journal

    Reframing Trust in Citizen Science: Comparative Insights From Two German Initiatives.

    Social studies of science·2026
    Same journal

    The Nine Lives of Trap-Neuter-Return in the Canary Islands.

    Social studies of science·2026
    Same journal

    Money-Work: Science Funding as Relational Socioeconomics.

    Social studies of science·2026
    Same journal

    Attending to 'Computational Universalism': Practices, Frictions, Events.

    Social studies of science·2026
    Same journal

    Enacting Protected Areas Through Monitoring: Knowledge Practices as Multispecies Spatiotemporal Achievements in Neusiedler See-Seewinkel National Park.

    Social studies of science·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Sociology of Science
    • History of Science
    • Scientific Specialization

    Background:

    • Traditional sociological accounts of scientific specialization emphasize social and instrumental factors.
    • These accounts often overlook the role of internal conceptual developments in the formation of new scientific disciplines.

    Observation:

    • This paper re-examines the process of specialization within science.
    • It challenges the exclusive focus on external (social, instrumental) drivers for the creation of new scientific fields.

    Findings:

    • Conceptual changes are a significant, often underestimated, factor in the genesis of scientific specialties.
    • Specific case studies of endocrinology and virology demonstrate how conceptual breakthroughs fueled their establishment as distinct fields.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Implications:

    • Acknowledging the role of conceptual change offers a more nuanced understanding of scientific progress and disciplinary evolution.
    • This perspective is crucial for analyzing the historical development and future trajectory of scientific knowledge and its organization.