Perception of motion and position relative to the earth. An overview

Results of the five experiments are consistent with the following generalizations. Canal-mediated turn perception (pitch, roll, or yaw) in earth-horizontal or earth-vertical plane, is suppressed in direct relationship to the magnitude of a linear acceleration vector lying in the plane of a responding canal when the magnitude of the linear vector is constant or increasing and when its direction is either fixed or rotating in the same direction as the concomitant canal signal. Canal-mediated turn perception (pitch, roll, or yaw) is not suppressed by a coplanar linear vector that is counterrotating relative to the canal signal. Change in perceived attitude (pitch, roll, or yaw) is very sluggish in the absence of concordant canal information; attitude change may not be an immediate otolith-mediated perceptual event but a slowly developing perception dependent upon cognitive appreciation of an immediate otolith angular position signal. Otolith phasic neural units, unreinforced by appropriate canal signals, may contribute more to a brief linear velocity component in perception than to rate of attitude change. Otolith-mediated attitude perception within a given earth-vertical plane can be distorted by strong coplanar angular velocity canal information. Once distorted, return to veridical attitude perception can be gradual because, in the absence of complimentary canal or visual information, recovery is dependent upon relatively slow cognitive appreciation of a prevailing otolith position signal. Several attractive hypotheses relating to the dynamics of attitude perception can only be tested by substantially more data on the dynamics of spatial orientation perception. Most of our objectives cannot be achieved without models that yield valid prediction of the dynamics of spatial orientation perception. All of the observations in these experiments were carried out in darkness, or, in the simulated catapult experiment, without external visual reference. Various forms of visual information will change the dynamics of spatial orientation perception. My discussion has been limited to consideration of the vestibular system, as though the canal and otolith systems completely controlled the dynamics of spatial orientation perceptions. Obviously other partners in the dynamics of postural control, including vision, proprioception, and expectation, must be included in this challenging field of research. Dedication to stereotyped ideas about objectivity in the 20th century has hindered advancement of knowledge on the dynamics of spatial orientation perception relative to rate of progress achieved by several scientists of the 18th and 19th centuries, who provided word pictures of perceived motions and tilts along with descriptions of the motions that engendered the pictures.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)