Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 13, 2026

A Protocol to Set Up Needle-Free Connector with Positive Displacement on Central Venous Catheter in Intensive Care Unit
Published on: July 13, 2019
Vascular access complications after cardiac catheterisation: a nurse-led quality assurance program
Giuseppe Steffenino1, Stefania Dutto, Laura Conte
1Cardiac Catheterisation Unit, Cardiovascular Department, Ospedale S.Croce, Cuneo, Italy. steffenini.g@ospedale.cuneo.it
Insights
Vascular access complications were rare, especially with radial access. Vigorous anticoagulation increased risks, while closure devices did not significantly impact outcomes in cardiac catheterization procedures.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Vascular Surgery
- Interventional Radiology
Background:
- Vascular access complications following cardiac catheterization can lead to patient discomfort, extended hospital stays, and poorer outcomes.
- Assessing these complications is crucial for implementing quality improvement initiatives.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate vascular access complications in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization.
- To compare complication rates with and without the use of vascular closure devices.
- To establish a local benchmark for future quality improvements.
Main Methods:
- A prospective, nurse-led, single-center survey was conducted over four months.
- Data collected on all consecutive patients undergoing cardiac catheterization.
- Vascular access complications were systematically recorded for radial and femoral procedures.
Main Results:
- Out of 564 procedures, 83% used femoral access and 14% used radial access. Closure devices were used in 136 femoral procedures.
- Overall hematoma rate was 9.6%. Severe complications (hemoglobin loss >2g, transfusion, or vascular repair) occurred in 1.2% of cases.
- Severe complications were absent in radial access procedures. Femoral diagnostic and interventional procedures had complication rates of 0.4% and 2.4%, respectively. Higher activated coagulation times were noted in complicated transfemoral interventions.
Conclusions:
- Severe vascular access complications were infrequent, particularly with radial access, and lower than reported in many studies.
- Aggressive anticoagulation was linked to increased complications, whereas closure device use showed no significant association.
- Future strategies will prioritize radial access and less aggressive anticoagulation for transfemoral interventions.
Background:
Vascular access complications may be a cause of discomfort, prolonged hospital stay, and impaired outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac catheterisation.
Aims:
To assess vascular access complication in our patients with/without the use of closure devices as a first local benchmark for subsequent quality improvement.
Methods:
A nurse-led single-centre prospective survey of all vascular access complications in consecutive patients submitted to cardiac catheterisation during 4 months.
Results:
The radial and femoral access were used in 78 (14%) and 470 (83%), respectively, of 564 procedures, and a closure device was used in 136 of the latter. A haematoma (any size) was isolated and uneventful in 9.6% of cases. More severe complications (haemoglobin loss >2 g, need for blood transfusion or vascular repair) occurred in 1.2% of cases, namely: in none of the procedures with radial access, and in 0.4% and 2.4% of femoral diagnostic and interventional coronary procedures, respectively. During complicated (n=40) vs uncomplicated (n=172) transfemoral interventions, the activated coagulation time was 309+/-83 vs 271+/-71 s (p=0.004), but the use of closure devices was similar.
Conclusion:
Severe vascular access complications in our patients were fewer than in most reports, and virtually absent in radial procedures. Vigorous anticoagulation was associated with increased complications in our patients, but closure devices were not. A new policy including both the use of the radial access whenever possible, and a less aggressive anticoagulation regimen during transfemoral interventions will be tested.
More Related Videos
06:10Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: June 12, 2021
10:09Drug Treatment by Central Venous Catheter in a Mouse Model of Angiotensin II Induced Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm and Monitoring by 3D Ultrasound
Published on: August 4, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Cardiac Catheterization II: Right Heart Catheterization
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization
Cardiac Catheterization IV: Nursing Management
Endocarditis IV: Nursing Management
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management