Stopping trials early for commercial reasons: the risk-benefit relationship as a moral compass

A S Iltis1

  • 1Center for Health Care Ethics, Saint Louis University, 221 N. Grand Blvd, Saint Louis, MO 63103, USA. iltisas@slu.edu

Insights

Industry sponsors ending clinical trials early for profit is controversial. Early termination is unethical if risks outweigh benefits and crucial data is still obtainable, altering the fundamental risk-benefit balance.

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Research Ethics
  • Medical Trial Oversight
  • Biomedical Research Governance

Background:

  • Industry-sponsored clinical trials are frequently terminated early.
  • These early terminations, often for commercial reasons, raise ethical concerns regarding participant safety and scientific integrity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the ethical implications of early clinical trial termination by industry sponsors.
  • To establish the primary ethical consideration for assessing such decisions.

Main Methods:

  • This study presents a philosophical argument.
  • It analyzes the concept of the risk-benefit relationship in human research ethics.

Main Results:

  • Early termination is ethically impermissible if the potential scientific benefits do not justify the risks already borne by participants.
  • Such termination constitutes an unethical alteration of the established risk-benefit relationship.

Conclusions:

  • The risk-benefit relationship is the principal ethical consideration when assessing early trial terminations.
  • Unethical alterations to this relationship violate the foundational principles of human research, informed consent, and investigator agreement.

Related Concept Videos

Clinical Trials01:16

Clinical Trials

Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Clinical Trials: Overview01:11

Clinical Trials: Overview

Clinical development focuses on how the drug will interact with the human body and encompasses four key phases of clinical trials, each serving a specific purpose in assessing the safety and effectiveness of new drugs. These phases overlap and build upon one another. Phase I involves a small group of healthy volunteers (typically 20-80 individuals) or, in cases where significant toxicity is expected, patients with the targeted disease, such as cancer or AIDS. The volunteers are tested for...
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
Hazard Ratio01:12

Hazard Ratio

The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial evaluating a...
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...