Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 17, 2026

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
Stopping trials early for commercial reasons: the risk-benefit relationship as a moral compass
1Center for Health Care Ethics, Saint Louis University, 221 N. Grand Blvd, Saint Louis, MO 63103, USA. iltisas@slu.edu
Abstract:
Decisions by industry sponsors to end clinical trials early for commercial reasons have been the subject of controversy. I argue that the principal consideration in assessing these decisions ought to be the way in which the termination would affect the trial's risk-benefit relationship. If there is not yet sufficient benefit to be gained from the study to offset the risks to which participants were exposed and it is expected that important scientific information would be obtained if the trial were continued, early termination constitutes an unethical alteration of the risk-benefit relationship. This violates the grounds on which permission is given to conduct human research, patients consent to participate, and investigators agree to conduct studies. These knowable and avoidable changes in risk-benefit relationship should generally be seen as impermissible.
Insights
Industry sponsors ending clinical trials early for profit is controversial. Early termination is unethical if risks outweigh benefits and crucial data is still obtainable, altering the fundamental risk-benefit balance.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Research Ethics
- Medical Trial Oversight
- Biomedical Research Governance
Background:
- Industry-sponsored clinical trials are frequently terminated early.
- These early terminations, often for commercial reasons, raise ethical concerns regarding participant safety and scientific integrity.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the ethical implications of early clinical trial termination by industry sponsors.
- To establish the primary ethical consideration for assessing such decisions.
Main Methods:
- This study presents a philosophical argument.
- It analyzes the concept of the risk-benefit relationship in human research ethics.
Main Results:
- Early termination is ethically impermissible if the potential scientific benefits do not justify the risks already borne by participants.
- Such termination constitutes an unethical alteration of the established risk-benefit relationship.
Conclusions:
- The risk-benefit relationship is the principal ethical consideration when assessing early trial terminations.
- Unethical alterations to this relationship violate the foundational principles of human research, informed consent, and investigator agreement.
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Ethics in Research
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial evaluating a...
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...

