Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

How do speakers avoid ambiguous linguistic expressions?

Victor S Ferreira1, L Robert Slevc, Erin S Rogers

  • 1Department of Psychology 0109, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0109, USA. vferreira@ucsd.edu

Cognition
|July 6, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Language switches can be monitored but not fully controlled: Eye-tracking evidence for syntax-driven language control.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same author

Investigating the replicability of the social and behavioural sciences.

Nature·2026
Same author

¿Sabes si viene un code-switch? Bilinguals can predict upcoming code-switches given enough context.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same author

Decision-Making on Nicotine Replacement Therapy Use and Product Selection: An Explorative Qualitative Study Among Chinese Americans Who Smoke.

International journal of environmental research and public health·2026
Same author

Music Ensemble: a large dataset on musicianship, cognition, and personality in musicians and nonmusicians.

Scientific data·2026
Same author

Lexical tone is different and special: Evidence from a speeded repeated production task.

Journal of memory and language·2026

Speakers avoid ambiguity in language, especially nonlinguistic types. Linguistic ambiguity is avoided after articulation, suggesting production processes are more sensitive to nonlinguistic ambiguity.

Area of Science:

  • Psycholinguistics
  • Cognitive Science
  • Linguistics

Background:

  • Ambiguity in language presents challenges for both comprehension and production.
  • Understanding how speakers navigate and avoid ambiguous expressions is crucial for effective communication.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how speakers avoid producing linguistically and nonlinguistically ambiguous expressions.
  • To differentiate the roles of comprehension and production processes in ambiguity avoidance.

Main Methods:

  • Speakers described target objects in contexts with potential linguistic and nonlinguistic ambiguities.
  • Experimental manipulation varied the presence of foil objects to test ambiguity detection timing.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Speakers sometimes avoided linguistic ambiguity, even before producing it, suggesting early comprehension detection.
  • Once produced, linguistic ambiguity was consistently avoided for subsequent meanings, indicating post-production detection.
  • Nonlinguistic ambiguity was almost always avoided, showing higher sensitivity in production processes.

Conclusions:

  • Production processes are more sensitive to nonlinguistic ambiguity than linguistic ambiguity.
  • Linguistic ambiguity avoidance appears to be a more robust process occurring after articulation.