Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Contrasting pathways to tree longevity in gymnosperms and angiosperms.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Establishing foundations: Designing a long-term experiment to evaluate whether nestboxes assist population recovery of an endangered species after fire.

PloS one·2025
Same author

Estimating the realised economic value of a historic Mediterranean fruit fly eradication.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Effects of long-term intraspecific trait change on bird community functional structure.

Current biology : CB·2025
Same author

Plant Responses to a Re-emergence of Cultural Burning in Long-Unburnt, Threatened Temperate Woodlands.

Global change biology·2025
Same author

A significant increase in forest regeneration failure following logging is driven by climatic and management factors.

Journal of environmental management·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 25, 2025

Measuring the Structure, Composition, and Change of Underwater Environments with Large-area Imaging
09:19

Measuring the Structure, Composition, and Change of Underwater Environments with Large-area Imaging

Published on: April 18, 2025

1.3K

Marine reserves with ecological uncertainty.

R Quentin Grafton1, Tom Kompas, David Lindenmayer

  • 1Asia Pacific School of Economics and Government (APSEG), The Australian National University, Australia. quentin.grafton@anu.edu.au

Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
|July 7, 2005
PubMed
Summary

Marine reserves enhance fish population resilience and recovery, boosting economic returns for fishers. Optimal reserve sizes balance ecological benefits with fishing profits, showing no inherent tradeoff.

More Related Videos

Coral Reef Arks: An In Situ Mesocosm and Toolkit for Assembling Reef Communities
07:59

Coral Reef Arks: An In Situ Mesocosm and Toolkit for Assembling Reef Communities

Published on: January 6, 2023

4.1K
Development of New Methods for Quantifying Fish Density Using Underwater Stereo-video Tools
09:32

Development of New Methods for Quantifying Fish Density Using Underwater Stereo-video Tools

Published on: November 20, 2017

9.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 25, 2025

Measuring the Structure, Composition, and Change of Underwater Environments with Large-area Imaging
09:19

Measuring the Structure, Composition, and Change of Underwater Environments with Large-area Imaging

Published on: April 18, 2025

1.3K
Coral Reef Arks: An In Situ Mesocosm and Toolkit for Assembling Reef Communities
07:59

Coral Reef Arks: An In Situ Mesocosm and Toolkit for Assembling Reef Communities

Published on: January 6, 2023

4.1K
Development of New Methods for Quantifying Fish Density Using Underwater Stereo-video Tools
09:32

Development of New Methods for Quantifying Fish Density Using Underwater Stereo-video Tools

Published on: November 20, 2017

9.7K

Area of Science:

  • Marine ecology
  • Fisheries management
  • Conservation biology

Background:

  • Scientists advocate for ecosystem-based management and marine reserves to address fish population fluctuations.
  • Marine reserves show empirical benefits like increased spawning biomass, fish size, species abundance, and biodiversity.
  • Fishers often oppose marine reserves, citing minimal economic benefits.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the economic payoffs of marine reserves for fisheries under ecological uncertainty.
  • To determine if marine reserves offer economic benefits to fishers, even without overexploitation.
  • To assess the resilience effect of marine reserves on fish populations and harvest.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a stochastic optimal control model incorporating two forms of ecological uncertainty.
  • Simulated scenarios with varying reserve sizes and ecological uncertainty levels.
  • Analyzed the impact of reserves on population recovery, harvest levels, and economic returns.

Main Results:

  • Marine reserves create a resilience effect, enabling faster population recovery and increased harvest post-shock.
  • Optimal reserve strategies balance harvest maximization with ecological resilience, avoiding complete population exclusion.
  • Even in worst-case scenarios, marine reserves can increase fisher economic payoffs without prior overexploitation.
  • Reserve benefits are unattainable through traditional effort or output controls.

Conclusions:

  • Marine reserves can enhance both ecological resilience and economic payoffs for fisheries.
  • Optimal marine reserve design can align conservation goals with fisher profitability.
  • There is often no tradeoff between economic and ecological benefits when reserves are optimally sized.