Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Key issues in hearing aid selection and evaluation.

D Byrne1

  • 1National Acoustic Laboratories, Chatswood, NSW, Australia.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology
|March 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Generation of equine-specific local antibiograms: reproductive tract of mares and fillies in Western Australia.

Australian veterinary journal·2026
Same author

Neurological and neurodevelopmental effects of Covid and MIS-C on children.

Pediatric research·2025
Same author

Perineural tumour spread in head and neck cancer: a pictorial review.

Clinical radiology·2024
Same author

Outcomes for Emergency Department Final Diagnosis of Non-specific Complaint compared to Dyspnoea and Pain.

Acute medicine·2024
Same author

Short- and long-term mortality following acute medical admission.

QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians·2023
Same author

Yield of brain MRI in children with autism spectrum disorder.

European journal of pediatrics·2023
Same journal

Psychometric Rigor Before Clinical or Research Implementation.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2026
Same journal

American Academy of Audiology Health-Related Quality of Life Benefits of Amplification for Adults with Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review Protocol.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2026
Same journal

Evidence Synthesis and Open Science: A Tutorial for Systematic Reviews and Beyond in Audiology Research.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2026
Same journal

State and Trait Anxiety Alter Postural Control in Healthy Adults.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2026
Same journal

Differentiating Superior and Inferior Vestibular Neuritis: Insights from an Integrated VEMP and vHIT Assessment.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2026
Same journal

Test-Retest Reliability of the Triangle Completion Test.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2026
See all related articles

Hearing aid frequency response significantly impacts speech perception. New prescription rules are needed, and the Articulation Index requires further validation for specific hearing loss types.

Area of Science:

  • Audiology
  • Speech and Hearing Sciences
  • Hearing Aid Technology

Background:

  • Hearing aid selection and evaluation involve complex factors.
  • Understanding the impact of frequency response on speech perception is crucial.
  • Current methods for predicting aided performance may have limitations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the effect of frequency response differences on speech intelligibility and pleasantness.
  • To evaluate the adequacy of current gain prescription methods.
  • To assess the applicability of the Articulation Index for predicting hearing aid performance.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of two studies on frequency response characteristics and listener judgments.
  • Examination of evidence regarding separate frequency response prescription rules.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussion of signal audibility using simplified Articulation Index schemes.
  • Main Results:

    • Small to moderate frequency response differences often altered speech judgments, but not always.
    • Prescribing gain at each frequency separately is not consistently satisfactory.
    • Inaccurate signal level knowledge can lead to incorrect conclusions when using the Articulation Index.
    • The Articulation Index may not be suitable for steeply sloping high-frequency hearing losses.

    Conclusions:

    • Frequency response characteristics play a significant role in hearing aid outcomes.
    • There is a need for revised, separate frequency response prescription rules.
    • Further research is required to validate the Articulation Index for specific hearing loss profiles before its widespread recommendation in hearing aid evaluations.