Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 17, 2026

A Kinetic Fluorescence-based Ca2+ Mobilization Assay to Identify G Protein-coupled Receptor Agonists, Antagonists, and Allosteric Modulators
Published on: February 20, 2018
Persistent binding and functional antagonism by xanomeline at the muscarinic M5 receptor
Marianne K O Grant1, Esam E El-Fakahany
1Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Abstract:
Xanomeline is a functionally selective M1/M4 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor agonist. We have previously identified a novel mode of interaction of this ligand with the muscarinic M1 receptor that involves persistent binding and activation of the receptor after extensive washout. In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that xanomeline also binds in a wash-resistant manner to muscarinic receptor subtypes where it exhibits low or no efficacy, such as the M5 receptor subtype. A secondary hypothesis is that persistent binding of xanomeline to the M5 receptor results in wash-resistant antagonism to the effects of full agonists. These hypotheses were tested in Chinese hamster ovary cells stably expressing the M5 receptor. In these cells, xanomeline is a weak partial agonist and is able to inhibit carbachol-induced phosphoinositide hydrolysis to the maximal response of xanomeline in a concentration-dependent manner. Pretreatment with xanomeline followed by extensive washing resulted in a significant wash-resistant reduction in receptor affinity with no significant change in maximal cell surface receptor density. This was associated with wash-resistant antagonism of carbachol-induced activation of phosphoinositide hydrolysis at the M5 receptor, reflected as decreased carbachol potency without a change in the maximal response. Similar experiments using the partial agonist pilocarpine demonstrated a reduction of pilocarpine potency as well as maximal response. Our results clearly indicate that wash-resistant binding of xanomeline to the muscarinic M5 receptor is accompanied by persistent antagonism of receptor function. They also suggest a relationship between the efficacy of xanomeline and the functional consequences of its wash-resistant binding at different muscarinic receptor subtypes.
More Related Videos
07:09Subcutaneous Administration of Muscarinic Antagonists and Triple-Immunostaining of the Levator Auris Longus Muscle in Mice
Published on: September 8, 2011
07:16Methods for the Discovery of Novel Compounds Modulating a Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid Receptor Type A Neurotransmission
Published on: August 16, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Cholinergic Antagonists: Chemistry and Structure-Activity Relationship
Cholinergic Receptors: Muscarinic
The subtypes M1, M3, and M5 couple with the Gq subunit and activate the phospholipase C (PLC) activity, mobilizing intracellular Ca2+. Activation...
Nondepolarizing (Competitive) Neuromuscular Blockers: Mechanism of Action
Competitive antagonists prevent acetylcholine from binding to its receptor, inhibiting membrane depolarization. Without conformational changes or intrinsic...
Cholinergic Antagonists: Pharmacological Actions
Gastrointestinal Effects: Antimuscarinics reduce gut contractions, increase gastric emptying, and slow intestinal transit. They partly inhibit gastric acid secretion...
Cholinergic Antagonists: Pharmacokinetics
Antiasthma Drugs: Muscarinic Receptor Antagonists
Antimuscarinic agents compete with ACh for the same binding site on the muscarinic receptors. By binding to these receptors, they inhibit the downstream effects of ACh and block the parasympathetic...