Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Simultaneous conditioning in honeybees (Apis mellifera).

J D Batson1, J S Hoban, M E Bitterman

  • 1University of Hawaii.

Journal of Comparative Psychology (Washington, D.C. : 1983)
|June 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Amsel's analysis of reward-schedule effects.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2013
Same author

Minor studies from the psychological laboratory of Cornell University; Centrifugal swing effects in the human stylus maze.

The American journal of psychology·2010
Same author

Notes on the results of Army intelligence testing in World War I.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2010
Same author

Transfer of decrement in ocular tasks.

The American journal of psychology·2010
Same author

Minimal clues in the peak-of-tension procedure for determining guilt.

The American journal of psychology·2010
Same author

The relation between frequency of blinking and effort expended in mental work.

Journal of experimental psychology·2010

Honeybees rapidly learn odor-sucrose associations, even without temporal overlap. This suggests that simultaneous conditioning effectively trains honeybees (Apis mellifera) in olfactory learning tasks.

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral Science
  • Neuroscience
  • Entomology

Background:

  • Classical conditioning is a fundamental learning process.
  • Honeybees (Apis mellifera) are valuable models for studying associative learning.
  • Understanding olfactory learning in bees informs broader cognitive principles.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the role of conditioned stimulus-unconditioned stimulus (CS-US) overlap in honeybee classical conditioning.
  • To determine if simultaneous CS-US presentation facilitates associative learning.
  • To explore the impact of reward amount on honeybee learning.

Main Methods:

  • Classical conditioning using odor (CS) and sucrose (US) to elicit proboscis extension.
  • Experiment 1: Tested forward conditioning with and without CS-US overlap.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Experiments 2 & 3: Employed simultaneous CS-US presentation and differential conditioning paradigms.

    • Main Results:

    • Rapid conditioning occurred even without CS-US temporal overlap.
    • Honeybees showed increased response to a trained odor after simultaneous conditioning.
    • Differential conditioning demonstrated stronger responses to odors paired with sucrose (S+) compared to unpaired odors (S-).

    Conclusions:

    • Honeybee classical conditioning is highly efficient, with rapid learning observed even in simultaneous conditioning paradigms.
    • The results challenge assumptions about the necessity of temporal overlap for associative learning in bees.
    • The findings contribute to understanding the mechanisms of reward processing in insect learning.