Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Generating spatial and nonspatial attentional control: An ERP study.

Heleen A Slagter1, Albert Kok, Nisan Mol

  • 1Department of Psychonomics, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. slagter@wisc.edu

Psychophysiology
|July 13, 2005
PubMed
Summary

This study explored attentional control using event-related potentials. Findings reveal distinct brain activity patterns for general attentional set generation versus dimension-specific processing.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Representationalism can connect neuroscience and philosophy.

Frontiers in cognition·2026
Same author

A collaborative guide to Rapid Invisible Frequency Tagging (RIFT): Methods, insights, and recommendations.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same author

Prediction in action: Toward an empirical science of active inference.

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews·2026
Same author

The Pip-and-Pop Effect in Depth: How Multisensory Stimuli Influence Depth Perception.

Multisensory research·2026
Same author

Independent Markers of Attentional Shifts.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same author

Grounding distractor inhibition in action control: Implicit distractor-location learning is viewer dependent.

Cognition·2026

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Psychology
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Attentional control is crucial for focusing on relevant information.
  • Understanding the neural basis of attentional set formation and maintenance is key.
  • Previous research has not fully delineated dimension-specific attentional processes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate dimension specificity in attentional control.
  • To differentiate neural processes underlying attentional set generation from those involved in maintaining dimension-specific information.
  • To examine how task-relevant feature variations impact attentional control mechanisms.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized event-related potentials (ERPs) and dipole source modeling.
  • Employed cued attention tasks with varying task-relevant information (same, within-dimension, between-dimension).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Manipulated the dimension (color or location) of task-relevant features.

    • Main Results:

    • Identified a dorsal posterior positivity (starting at 260 ms postcue) associated with attentional control.
    • Observed enhanced positivity over left posterior scalp regions from 580 ms onward, particularly when color was task-relevant.
    • Demonstrated a temporal distinction between generic attentional set generation and dimension-specific processing.

    Conclusions:

    • Attentional control involves generic processes for generating an attentional set.
    • Dimension-specific processes are engaged later, supporting the persistence of task-relevant information in working memory.
    • Neural mechanisms differentiate between the initial formation and sustained maintenance of attentional sets based on feature dimensions.