Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 17, 2026

Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
Effect of concomitant antiarrhythmic therapy on survival in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators
Andrew T Ho1, Sudha M Pai, Pam Timothy
1Loma Linda University Medical Center, CA 92354, USA.
Insights
Beta-blockers improve survival in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs). Amiodarone and sotalol showed no survival impact, while digoxin trended towards a negative effect.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy is increasingly used for sudden cardiac death prevention.
- Concomitant antiarrhythmic drug use in ICD patients is common but its survival impact is unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the effect of various antiarrhythmic drugs on survival in patients with ICDs.
Main Methods:
- Survival analysis of 360 ICD patients using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression.
- Mortality data obtained from the national death index.
Main Results:
- Beta-blocker use was significantly associated with improved survival (P = 0.0005), independent of other factors.
- Digoxin showed a trend towards lower survival on univariate analysis (P = 0.006) but not after adjustment.
- Amiodarone and sotalol had a neutral effect on survival.
Conclusions:
- Beta-blockers demonstrate a favorable impact on survival in ICD patients.
- Amiodarone and sotalol appear to have a neutral effect on survival.
- Further research is needed to clarify the survival effects of antiarrhythmic drugs in ICD recipients.
Background:
Application of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy is expanding to include both primary and secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death and has been proven to be superior to conventional antiarrhythmic therapies. Concomitant antiarrhythmic drug therapy in patients with ICD is common. These drugs are potentially proarrhythmic, alter defibrillation thresholds, and may affect response to device therapy. However, the impact of concomitant antiarrhythmic drug therapy on survival in patients with ICD devices is unknown.
Methods:
We investigated the effect of different antiarrhythmic drugs on survival when given concomitantly in 360 consecutive ICD patients from our university medical center. Mortality data were obtained from the national death index. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Corrections for significant covariates and group differences were made using the Cox regression model.
Results:
Patients were followed up for 4.4 +/- 3.7 years. There were 68 deaths over this period with a 5-year survival of 80%. Patient characteristics were: age 62 +/- 13 years, left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) 33 +/- 17%, ischemic etiology of LV dysfunction 68%, diabetes mellitus 19%, hypertension 49%, atrial fibrillation 23%, digoxin 43%, beta-blocker 46%, amiodarone 28%, and sotalol 9%. The use of beta-blockers was associated with a better survival (P = 0.0005). This effect persisted after correcting for age, heart rate, EF, and ischemic etiology. The beneficial effect of beta-blocker was unrelated to its effect on heart rate. Digoxin use was associated with a lower survival only on univariate analysis (P = 0.006), but not after adjusting for other variables on a Cox regression model (P = 0.093). Amiodarone and sotalol were found to have a neutral effect on survival.
Conclusion:
In patients with ICDs, beta-blockers had a favorable effect on survival. Sotalol and amiodarone had a neutral effect on survival. There was a trend toward a deleterious effect with digoxin use. These findings suggest a need for further investigation addressing survival effects of antiarrhythmic drugs when given concomitantly in patients with ICDs.
More Related Videos
16:40A New Single Chamber Implantable Defibrillator with Atrial Sensing: A Practical Demonstration of Sensing and Ease of Implantation
Published on: February 28, 2012
05:43Determination of Continuity Index Values in Atrial Fibrillation Ablation with Proactive Esophageal Cooling
Published on: April 19, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class I Agents as Sodium Channel Blockers
Class 1A Antiarrhythmic Drugs: These drugs work by moderately blocking sodium channels,...
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias
ECG Interpretation of Arrhythmias II: Atrial, Junctional and Ventricular Arrhythmias
Heart Failure Drugs: Inotropic Agents
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class III Agents as Potassium Channel Blockers