Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Measurement validity in ophthalmology.

Tariq M Aslam1, Niall Patton

  • 1Manchester Eye Hospital, Manchester, England, U.K. TAslam@aol.com

Ophthalmic Epidemiology
|July 16, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Irreducible Encounter: Human Skills, Artificial Intelligence, and the Future of Ophthalmic Care.

Ophthalmology and therapy·2026
Same author

Anatomic and Functional Outcomes after Pars Plana Vitrectomy for Giant Retinal Tear-Related Retinal Detachment: The Manchester Giant Retinal Tear Study.

Ophthalmology. Retina·2026
Same author

To Drain or Not to Drain? The Manchester Buckle Study.

Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.)·2026
Same author

Response to letter to the editor: macular volume in macular pucker.

Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie·2026
Same author

Post-Visual Diagnosis Distress: The Weight of Threatened Sight.

Ophthalmology and therapy·2026
Same author

Effective communication strategies in intravitreal therapy: How to listen and how to talk to people who need injections in their eyes.

Survey of ophthalmology·2026
Same journal

Nationwide Analysis of Eye-Related Emergency Department Visits in South Korea: NEDIS-EYE REPORT 1.

Ophthalmic epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Association Between Demyelinating Disease and Dry Eye Syndrome: A Matched Case-Control Study.

Ophthalmic epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Correspondence: Caution May Be Required with mRNA Covid-19 Vaccinations Related to the Corneal Endothelium.

Ophthalmic epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Longitudinal Development of Macular Ganglion Cell Layer Thickness in Children: The Copenhagen Child Cohort 2000 Eye Study.

Ophthalmic epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Impact of Cataract Surgery on Psychological Well-Being and Economy: The SCOPE Study Protocol.

Ophthalmic epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Online Survey on Myopia Progression Among Chinese Adult Undergraduates: A Pilot Study.

Ophthalmic epidemiology·2026
See all related articles

Ensuring measurement validity in ophthalmic research is crucial. This article clarifies validity concepts and terminology, helping ophthalmologists confidently assess research instruments and their findings.

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmic research methodology
  • Measurement validity in healthcare

Background:

  • Ophthalmic research utilizes diverse measurement parameters (visual function, quality of life, physical measures).
  • Instruments range from questionnaires to electronic devices.
  • All measurement tools necessitate robust validity evidence for reliable inferences.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the nature and importance of measurement validity in ophthalmic research.
  • To explain key terminology related to validity.
  • To guide ophthalmologists in assessing instrument validity for confident data interpretation.

Main Methods:

  • Comprehensive literature search using Medline, PubMed, and Ovid.
  • Inclusion of referenced papers from journals and books.

Related Experiment Videos

  • International scope with translation of foreign texts.

    • Main Results:

    • Validity is an often overlooked but critical aspect of ophthalmic measurements.
    • Understanding different forms of validity is essential for critical appraisal of research instruments.
    • Lack of validity evidence undermines the confidence in research findings.

    Conclusions:

    • Ophthalmologists must be aware of validity principles to evaluate research tools.
    • Assessing instrument validity ensures that inferences drawn from ophthalmic research are reliable.
    • This article provides a foundation for understanding and applying validity concepts in practice.