Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 17, 2026

Doppler Ultrasound-Based Leg Blood Flow Assessment During Single-Leg Knee-Extensor Exercise in an Uncontrolled Setting
Published on: December 15, 2023
Oscillometric blood pressure devices and simulators: measurements of repeatability and differences between models
A J Sims1, C A Reay, D R Bousfield
1Regional Medical Physics Department, Freeman Hospital, Newcastlle upon Tyne, UK. a.j.sims@newcastle.ac.uk
Non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) simulators show good repeatability, but variations in pressure pulse envelopes and device algorithms lead to differing NIBP readings. Further clinical studies are needed for diverse patient groups.
Area of Science:
- Biomedical Engineering
- Medical Device Technology
- Clinical Measurement
Background:
- Oscillometric non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) devices are widely used for patient monitoring.
- The accuracy and reliability of NIBP devices depend on the simulators used for their testing.
- Understanding the characteristics of pressure pulse envelopes generated by simulators is crucial for accurate NIBP device evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the repeatability and pressure pulse envelope characteristics of NIBP simulators.
- To investigate the impact of different pressure pulse envelopes on NIBP device performance.
- To quantify the variability in NIBP measurements arising from different oscillometric algorithms.
Main Methods:
- Evaluated three NIBP simulator models and 18 patient monitors with NIBP functionality.
- Developed a high-accuracy pressure measurement system (0.048 mmHg) to quantify simulator repeatability.
- Measured the effect of envelope variations using three simulators with one NIBP device and algorithm differences using one simulator across 18 devices.
Main Results:
- NIBP simulators consistently generate repeatable pressure pulse envelopes (< 0.2 mmHg), though magnitude and shape vary by simulator model.
- Oscillometric NIBP devices demonstrate high repeatability (< 2 mmHg) with consistent envelopes but show significant result differences due to distinct algorithms.
- Simulated 120/80 mmHg readings varied: systolic pressure estimates ranged from 112.6 to 126.6 mmHg (sd 3.0 mmHg), and diastolic from 74.8 to 86.9 mmHg (sd 3.5 mmHg).
Conclusions:
- Both NIBP simulators and NIBP devices exhibit sufficient repeatability for clinical applications.
- Differences in oscillometric algorithms contribute to measurement variability across NIBP devices.
- Further clinical research is necessary to define pressure pulse envelopes for various patient populations.
Related Concept Videos
Equipments Used To Measure Blood Pressure
This invasive approach involves cannulating a peripheral artery. During each cardiac contraction, pressure generates mechanical motion within the catheter, transmitted through rigid, fluid-filled tubing to a transducer. This transducer converts mechanical motion into electrical signals displayed as waveforms on a monitor. An automatic flushing system prevents blood backflow. Due to the potential risk of unexpected arterial blood loss, this method is primarily used in intensive...
Measurement of Blood Pressure
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
Sites for measuring blood pressure
The Brachial Artery: Primary Site for Blood Pressure Measurement
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(one-step method)
Prepare for the Procedure:
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(two-step method)

