Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A practical comparison of group-sequential and adaptive designs.

Patrick J Kelly1, M Roshini Sooriyarachchi, Nigel Stallard

  • 1Medical and Pharmaceutical Statistics Research Unit, The University of Reading, UK. patrick.kelly@reading.ac.uk

Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics
|July 19, 2005
PubMed
Summary

Sequential and adaptive clinical trial designs offer flexibility in monitoring accumulating data. Adaptive designs allow more modifications, but group-sequential methods are preferred when interim analyses are very small, ensuring statistical validity.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Increased Risk of Complications in Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) of Femoral Neck Fracture (FNF): A Comparative Meta-Analysis of THA Outcomes in FNF and Osteoarthritis.

Hip & pelvis·2026
Same author

Not All Randomized Control Trials Are the Same: Response.

The American journal of sports medicine·2026
Same author

Group-Sequential Designs With an Externally-Driven Change of Primary Endpoint.

Statistics in medicine·2025
Same author

In Silico Clinical Trials in Drug Development: A Systematic Review.

Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science·2025
Same author

Cost of Treating Patients Who Undergo Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases: An Australian Pilot Study.

Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology·2025
Same author

Out-of-pocket medical costs in relation to resection of colorectal liver metastases in the Australian healthcare system.

Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer·2025

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trial Design
  • Statistical Inference

Background:

  • Sequential methods formally analyze accumulating clinical trial data.
  • Interim analyses can modify trial design or stop trials early for efficacy or futility.
  • Pre-defined stopping rules are crucial for controlling type I error rates.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Compare two adaptive design methods with the established group-sequential method.
  • Evaluate stopping boundaries and statistical power across different trial designs.
  • Assess the impact of sample size modifications on error rates and power.

Main Methods:

  • Comparison of stopping boundaries between adaptive and group-sequential designs.
  • Power analysis of trials designed to be as similar as possible.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Investigation of type I error rate control under sample size adjustments.

    • Main Results:

    • All methods adequately control type I error and power with sample size adjustments based on variance estimates, provided interim analyses are sufficiently large.
    • Group-sequential methods are superior when interim analyses yield very small sample sizes.
    • Adaptive designs maintain type I error control even with sample size adjustments based on treatment effect estimates.

    Conclusions:

    • Adaptive designs offer greater flexibility for modifications compared to group-sequential methods.
    • Both approaches control statistical error rates effectively under specific conditions.
    • The choice of method depends on the potential for small interim sample sizes and the need for design flexibility.