Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Engineering craniofacial scaffolds.

S J Hollister1, C Y Lin, E Saito

  • 1Skeletal Engineering Group, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.

Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research
|July 19, 2005
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evaluation of multi-scale mineralized collagen-polycaprolactone composites for bone tissue engineering.

Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials·2016
Same author

3D-printed Bioresorbable Scaffold for Periodontal Repair.

Journal of dental research·2015
Same author

Computed tomography-based tissue-engineered scaffolds in craniomaxillofacial surgery.

The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS·2007
Same author

Spontaneous subconjunctival orbital fat prolapse: report of three cases.

Chang Gung medical journal·2001
Same author

Correlation between anti-Ro/La titers and clinical findings of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Zhonghua yi xue za zhi = Chinese medical journal; Free China ed·2001
Same author

Cellular mechanisms that cause suppressed gamma interferon secretion in endotoxin-tolerant mice.

Infection and immunity·2001

Engineered craniofacial scaffolds match patient anatomy and bone properties. These biomaterial scaffolds successfully support bone regeneration, offering a promising solution for craniofacial reconstruction.

Area of Science:

  • Biomaterials Engineering
  • Regenerative Medicine
  • Craniofacial Surgery

Background:

  • Craniofacial reconstruction requires specialized scaffolds with mechanical properties similar to native bone.
  • Existing methods often lack the precision to match complex anatomical defects and desired mechanical characteristics.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To engineer craniofacial scaffolds with tailored mechanical properties and anatomical fit.
  • To evaluate the bone regeneration potential of these scaffolds in preclinical models.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized an integrated image-based design and solid free-form fabrication approach.
  • Scaffolds were designed for specific elasticity, permeability, and external anatomy.
  • Fabricated scaffolds from various biomaterials including titanium, degradable polymers, and ceramics.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Assessed mechanical properties (compressive modulus and strength) and bone regeneration via micro-CT, mechanical testing, and histology.

    • Main Results:

    • Fabricated scaffolds exhibited mechanical properties within the range of human craniofacial trabecular bone (modulus 50-2900 MPa, strength 2-56 MPa).
    • Scaffolds supported significant bone ingrowth in minipig mandibular defects (40-80% within 18 weeks), irrespective of pore size (400-1200 microns).
    • In vivo studies demonstrated bone regeneration capabilities, aided by BMP-7 transduced human gingival fibroblasts.

    Conclusions:

    • Integrated design and fabrication methods can produce patient-specific craniofacial scaffolds.
    • Manufactured scaffolds from diverse biomaterials meet mechanical and anatomical requirements.
    • These scaffolds effectively promote bone regeneration, indicating clinical applicability for craniofacial reconstruction.