Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Getting around.

Bernard S Strauss1

  • 1Department of Molecular Genetics and Cell Biology, The University of Chicago, 920 East 58th Street, Chicago, IL 60637, USA. bs19@uchicago.edu

DNA Repair
|July 19, 2005
PubMed
Summary

This essay reflects on the author's laboratory's DNA repair research history. It also addresses concerns about scientific dishonesty in research authorship.

Related Experiment Videos

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Insertion of an Alu Element in Thyroglobulin Gene as a Novel Cause of Congenital Hypothyroidism.

Thyroid : official journal of the American Thyroid Association·2019
Same author

Martynas Yčas: The "Archivist" of the RNA Tie Club.

Genetics·2019
Same author

Why Is DNA Double Stranded? The Discovery of DNA Excision Repair Mechanisms.

Genetics·2018
Same author

A Physicist's Quest in Biology: Max Delbrück and "Complementarity".

Genetics·2017
Same author

Biochemical Genetics and Molecular Biology: The Contributions of George Beadle and Edward Tatum.

Genetics·2016
Same author

Beadle and Tatum and the origins of molecular biology.

Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology·2016
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Area of Science:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Genetics
  • Biochemistry

Background:

  • The author reflects on their laboratory's historical contributions to DNA repair research.
  • This reflection is prompted by a request for a historical perspective on the lab's work.

Discussion:

  • The writing process involved recalling past colleagues, discoveries, and missed opportunities in DNA repair research.
  • An article discussing pervasive dishonesty in scientific authorship prompted the author to connect these themes to their experiences.

Key Insights:

  • Recollections of scientific endeavors highlight both successes and failures in DNA repair research.
  • The author uses their experiences to comment on issues of scientific integrity and authorship.

Outlook:

  • Further exploration of the historical context of DNA repair research is warranted.
  • Continued dialogue on scientific ethics and transparent authorship practices is crucial.