Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 17, 2026
A Swine Burn Model for Investigating the Healing Process in Multiple Depth Burn Wounds
Published on: February 23, 2024
Biobrane versus duoderm for the treatment of intermediate thickness burns in children: a prospective, randomized
Christi Cassidy1, Shawn D St Peter, Stephanie Lacey
1Department of Pediatric Surgery, The Children's Mercy Hospital, 2401 Gillham Road, Kansas City, MO 64108, USA.
Insights
For pediatric partial thickness burns, Biobrane and Duoderm dressings show equal effectiveness in healing and pain management. Duoderm is a more cost-effective option for treating pediatric burn wounds.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric burn care
- Wound healing technologies
- Comparative medical device efficacy
Background:
- Intermediate thickness burns in children require effective wound management.
- Biobrane and Duoderm are commonly used dressings for burn treatment.
- Direct comparative data on their efficacy in pediatric populations is limited.
Purpose of the Study:
- To prospectively compare Biobrane and Duoderm for treating pediatric partial thickness burns.
- To evaluate differences in wound healing time, pain scores, and treatment costs.
- To determine the optimal dressing for this patient group.
Main Methods:
- Prospective, randomized study design.
- Inclusion of pediatric patients (<18 years) with <10% total body surface area partial thickness burns.
- Data collection on injury mechanism, healing time, pain, and material costs.
Main Results:
- No statistically significant difference in time to complete healing between Biobrane and Duoderm groups.
- No significant difference in reported pain scores between the two treatment groups.
- Biobrane treatment was statistically more expensive than Duoderm.
Conclusions:
- Both Biobrane and Duoderm are equally effective for treating pediatric partial thickness burns.
- Duoderm presents a more cost-effective alternative.
- Duoderm can be considered a primary treatment choice for pediatric partial thickness burn wounds.
Abstract:
In this study, we directly compared the efficacy of Biobrane and Duoderm for the treatment of small intermediate thickness burns in children in a prospective, randomized fashion to determine their relative impact on wound healing, pain scores, and cost. Patients under 18 years of age with intermediate thickness burns on a surface area less than 10% were enrolled and treated with one of the two dressing systems. Data collected included mechanism of injury, time to complete healing, pain scores, and institutional cost of materials until healing was complete. No significant difference in time to healing or pain scores was detected between the two groups. The cost of each treatment was statistically more expensive in the Biobrane group. The results of this study demonstrate that Duoderm and Biobrane provide equally effective treatment of partial thickness burns among in the pediatric population. However, Duoderm is statistically less expensive than Biobrane and can be considered a first-line treatment option for intermediate thickness burn wounds in children.
Related Concept Videos
01:22Burn Injuries
The damage results in the death of skin cells, which can lead to a massive loss of fluid. Dehydration, electrolyte imbalance, and renal and circulatory failure follow, which can be fatal. Burn patients are treated with intravenous fluids to offset...
01:19Clinical Applications of Epidermal Stem Cells