Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Reasoning deficits in ecstasy (MDMA) polydrug users.

John E Fisk1, Catharine Montgomery, Michelle Wareing

  • 1School of Psychology, Liverpool John Moores University, 15-21 Webster Street, Liverpool, L3 2ET, UK. j.e.fisk@livjm.ac.uk

Psychopharmacology
|July 19, 2005
PubMed
Summary

Ecstasy users struggle with reasoning tasks, often failing to provide answers due to working memory limitations. This suggests potential neurotoxic effects impacting cognitive functions like syllogistic reasoning.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effectiveness of Alcohol Use Disorder Pharmacotherapies by Sex: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Drug and alcohol review·2026
Same author

The Socioeconomic Impact of Long-Acting Injectable Buprenorphine.

ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR·2026
Same author

Everyday discrimination in individuals seeking treatment/receiving support for substance use and caregivers.

The International journal on drug policy·2026
Same author

The stigma of alcohol use during pregnancy: Exploring the impact of alcohol strength and social context on public perceptions.

PloS one·2026
Same author

A thematic analysis of flu vaccine hesitance in ethnically minoritised communities in Liverpool.

PloS one·2025
Same author

Investigating outcomes in a substance use treatment provider: a cross-sectional comparison of long-acting injectable buprenorphine and oral medication for opioid use disorder.

BMJ open·2025

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Psychology

Background:

  • Previous studies indicate cognitive deficits in ecstasy (3,4-methlylenedioxymethamphetamine) users, particularly in thinking and reasoning.
  • Syllogistic reasoning errors in ecstasy users may stem from impaired working memory capacity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if working memory limitations cause syllogistic reasoning errors in ecstasy users.
  • To explore the impact of ecstasy use on the ability to construct mental models of premises.

Main Methods:

  • Compared abstract syllogistic reasoning performance between 29 ecstasy users and 25 non-user controls.
  • Participants generated conclusions from provided premise pairs, with problem difficulty varied.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Ecstasy users were more likely to fail to generate a conclusion for all problem types.
  • Non-users made more errors on difficult problems, suggesting incomplete model construction.
  • Both groups performed above chance on easier problems, but non-users were more accurate.

    • Conclusions:

    • Ecstasy users' reduced working memory may hinder the construction of even a single premise model.
    • Observed deficits could be linked to 3,4-methlylenedioxymethamphetamine neurotoxicity.
    • Polydrug use (cannabis, cocaine) in ecstasy users complicates attributing deficits solely to ecstasy.