Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Continuous Bayesian adaptive randomization based on event times with covariates.

Ying Kuen Cheung1, Lurdes Y T Inoue, J Kyle Wathen

  • 1Department of Biostatistics, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 722 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA. yc632@columbia.edu

Statistics in Medicine
|July 19, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

EVALUATING MULTIPLEX DIAGNOSTIC TEST USING PARTIALLY ORDERED BAYES CLASSIFIER.

The annals of applied statistics·2026
Same author

Evaluating movement breaks as a public health strategy to mitigate the harms of prolonged sitting: a large-scale pragmatic intervention.

British journal of sports medicine·2026
Same author

Digital personalized trials of a multicomponent behavioral change intervention for increasing habitual low-intensity physical activity in middle-aged and older healthcare workers: results of a feasibility study.

Pilot and feasibility studies·2026
Same author

GENERALIZATION ERROR BOUNDS OF DYNAMIC TREATMENT REGIMES IN PENALIZED REGRESSION-BASED LEARNING.

Annals of statistics·2026
Same author

A SEQUENTIAL SIGNIFICANCE TEST FOR TREATMENT BY COVARIATE INTERACTIONS.

Statistica Sinica·2026
Same author

Comparing Adaptive Interventions under a General Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial Design via Multiple Comparisons with the Best.

Journal of statistical planning and inference·2026
Same journal

Optimal Weighted Tests for Replication Studies and the 'Two-Trials Rule' With Multiple Hypotheses.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Identifiable Copula-Double-Cox Models: A Fully Parametric Framework for Dependent Right-Censored Survival Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Moving From Individualized Risk-Based Prevention to Benefit-Based Prevention: Estimating Individualized Life-Years Gained From Prevention Services as a Basis for Eligibility.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

A Mixture of Distributed Lag Non-Linear Models to Account for Spatially Heterogeneous Exposure-Lag-Response Associations.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Practical Considerations for Gaussian Process Modeling for Causal Inference in Quasi-Experimental Studies With Panel Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Covariate Adjustment for Wilcoxon Two Sample Statistic and Test.

Statistics in medicine·2026
See all related articles

This study introduces novel Bayesian methods for adaptive clinical trial randomization, ethically assigning more patients to successful treatments. These outcome-adaptive strategies improve upon traditional methods by fully utilizing time-to-event data.

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trial Design
  • Medical Research

Background:

  • Traditional clinical trials often use balanced randomization, which may not ethically assign patients to superior treatments.
  • Existing outcome-adaptive methods can lose valuable information by simplifying time-to-event data into binary outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose and compare exact and approximate Bayesian outcome-adaptive randomization procedures for time-to-event outcomes.
  • To develop methods that incorporate baseline prognostic covariates and can be applied continuously.
  • To address the information loss in current adaptive methods.

Main Methods:

  • Development of exact and approximate Bayesian models for outcome-adaptive randomization.
  • Incorporation of time-to-event data and baseline covariates.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Application and simulation within a phase II acute leukaemia trial.

    • Main Results:

    • The proposed Bayesian methods provide a more informative approach to adaptive randomization.
    • These methods ethically favor superior treatments while preserving data integrity.
    • Simulations demonstrate the feasibility and potential benefits in a clinical setting.

    Conclusions:

    • Bayesian outcome-adaptive randomization offers an ethically sound and statistically robust alternative to conventional trial designs.
    • These methods enhance patient benefit and trial efficiency by leveraging interim data.
    • The proposed procedures are applicable to various clinical trial settings, particularly those with time-to-event endpoints.