Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Sequence learning: response structure and effector transfer.

Jin-Hoon Park1, Charles H Shea

  • 1Department of Health and Kinesiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-4243, USA.

The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. A, Human Experimental Psychology
|July 20, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effects of repetitive practice on motor learning and adaptability in foot position control for cerebellar ataxia.

International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation·2025
Same author

Dual-Task and Single-Task Practice Does Not Influence the Attentional Demands of Movement Sequence Representations.

Journal of motor behavior·2024
Same author

Across-task binding: The development of a representation in learning a continuous movement sequence.

Human movement science·2024
Same author

Attentional Demand of a Movement Sequence Guided by Visual-Spatial and by Motor Representations.

Journal of motor behavior·2022
Same author

Effects of multi-obstacle contexts on obstacle negotiation strategies in healthy older adults under dual-task conditions.

Gait & posture·2022
Same author

The influence of accuracy constraints on bimanual and unimanual sequence learning.

Neuroscience letters·2021
Same journal

Relations between emotion, illusory word perception, and orthographic repetition blindness: tests of binding theory.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
Same journal

Causal and noncausal conditionals: an integrated model of interpretation and reasoning.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
Same journal

Phonological similarity effects in verbal complex span.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
Same journal

By which name should I call thee? The consequences of having multiple names.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
Same journal

Stimulus similarity decrements in children's working memory span.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
Same journal

Lag-1 sparing in the attentional blink: benefits and costs of integrating two events into a single episode.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
See all related articles

This study explored how people learn repeated movement sequences. Shorter sequences were learned faster and organized abstractly, showing good effector transfer, while longer sequences became more automatic but less adaptable.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Motor Learning
  • Human-Computer Interaction

Background:

  • Understanding how the brain learns and controls complex motor skills is crucial for rehabilitation and skill acquisition.
  • Repeated movement sequences are fundamental to many daily activities and skilled performances.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the structural organization and effector transfer of learning repeated movement sequences.
  • To examine how practice influences the abstractness and effector independence of motor sequences.

Main Methods:

  • Participants practiced moving a lever to sequentially presented targets in varying sequence lengths (10- and 16-element).
  • Response structure, speed, and effector transfer were assessed after different practice durations (1 and 4 days).

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Shorter sequences (10-element) were learned faster and organized into fewer, more abstract subsequences.
  • Longer sequences (16-element) showed increased fluency with practice but reduced effector independence.
  • Effector transfer was high for initially organized sequences, suggesting abstract coding.

Conclusions:

  • Motor sequence learning involves organizing movements into abstract representations that can be generalized across effectors.
  • Extended practice can lead to more fluent but potentially less flexible motor control, relying more on effector-specific information.