Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 16, 2026

An Efficient Single-Person Technique for Milk Sampling from Laboratory Mice
Published on: March 28, 2025
Maximization of lactation milk production without decreasing persistency
1Dairy and Swine Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lennoxville, QC, Canada J1M 1Z3. clin@uoguelph.ca
Researchers compared six genetic selection strategies to improve dairy lactation milk yield without reducing persistency. Index I(R1) effectively increased milk yield while maintaining lactation curve persistency, offering a viable genetic approach.
Area of Science:
- Animal Breeding and Genetics
- Dairy Science
- Quantitative Genetics
Background:
- Optimizing dairy cow lactation curves is crucial for milk production efficiency.
- Balancing genetic gains for milk yield and lactation persistency presents a significant challenge in breeding programs.
- Estimated Breeding Values (EBVs) are key metrics for genetic selection in livestock.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate six distinct selection strategies for enhancing daily lactation curves in dairy animals.
- To identify strategies that improve lactation milk yield without compromising lactation persistency.
- To develop a genetic method for modifying lactation curves by controlling differential genetic gains across lactation stages.
Main Methods:
- Daily Estimated Breeding Values (EBVs) for lactation were treated as separate traits.
- Six selection strategies were compared: index I(R1) (equal gains at DIM 60 & 280), I(R2) (zero gain at DIM 60), I(d) (desired gains), I(u) (unstandardized EBV & persistency), I(w) (standardized EBV & persistency), and conventional EBV(L) selection.
- Lactation milk yield and persistency responses were assessed for each strategy.
Main Results:
- Index I(R2) maximized persistency but minimized milk yield response, indicating impracticality in inhibiting peak yield.
- Index I(u) yielded similar milk response to conventional selection but decreased persistency.
- Indices I(R1) and I(d) maintained persistency, with I(R1) showing a superior lactation response (669 kg EBV) compared to I(d) (560 kg EBV). Index I(w) showed potential for improving both traits, dependent on economic weighting.
Conclusions:
- Index I(R1) is a practical strategy for enhancing milk yield while preserving lactation persistency.
- No single strategy excelled in both milk yield and persistency; I(w) offers a balanced approach contingent on trait economic values.
- Standardizing EBVs by their standard deviations is essential in index construction when variances differ significantly, as demonstrated by I(u) vs. I(w) responses.
Related Concept Videos
Determination of Multiple Dosing Parameters: Steady-State, Minimum and Maximum Concentrations
Methods of Medium Optimization
Rational Dosage Regimen: Maintenance Dose and Loading Dose
In most cases, drugs are administered repetitively or infused continuously to maintain a steady-state concentration in the body. At a steady state,...
Pasteurization and Food Preservation
Production of Organic Acids
Upstream Processing

