Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Systems approach to reduce errors in surgery.

J Dankelman1, C A Grimbergen

  • 1Department of Mechanical Engineering and Marine Technology, Delft University of Technology, Mekelweg 2, 2628 CD Delft, The Netherlands. J.dankelman@wbmt.tudelft.nl

Surgical Endoscopy
|July 20, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Validation of a hand hygiene visual feedback system to improve compliance with drying time of alcohol-based hand rub in a neonatal intensive care unit: the Incubator Traffic Light system.

The Journal of hospital infection·2024
Same author

Inflicted head-injury by shaking-trauma in infants: the importance of spatiotemporal variations of the head's rotation center.

Scientific reports·2023
Same author

Feasibility of Narrow-Band Imaging, Intraductal Biopsy, and Laser Ablation During Mammary Ductoscopy: Protocol for an Interventional Study.

International journal of surgery protocols·2022
Same author

Correction to: Energetic soft-tissue treatment technologies: an overview of procedural fundamentals and safety factors.

Surgical endoscopy·2022
Same author

Safe implementation of hand held steerable laparoscopic instruments: a survey among EAES surgeons.

Updates in surgery·2022
Same author

SATA-LRS: A modular and novel steerable hand-held laparoscopic instrument platform for low-resource settings<sup>☆</sup>.

Medical engineering & physics·2022
Same journal

Efficacy and safety of transoral incisionless fundoplication in non-obese and obese adults: a population-based cohort study from the United States.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Minimally invasive versus open surgery for adhesive small bowel obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Enhanced view/extended totally extraperitoneal plasty (eTEP) Rives-Stoppa repair versus open Rives-Stoppa repair: a single-center retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Robotic-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection: a scoping review of preclinical and early clinical evidence.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Conversion of endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty to bariatric surgery.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Artificial intelligence and chatbots in general surgery: a survey among surgeons in Germany, Austria and Switzerland.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
See all related articles

Medical errors pose a significant challenge. This article explores the systems approach, focusing on analyzing system flaws rather than blaming individuals to prevent adverse outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Medical error reduction
  • Patient safety
  • Surgical safety

Background:

  • Medical errors are a critical challenge for the next decade.
  • Traditionally, medical and surgical errors are attributed to individual practitioners.
  • Existing approaches often focus on individual blame, hindering effective error reduction.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide insight into the systems approach for reducing medical errors.
  • To shift the focus from individual blame to systemic analysis.
  • To explore methods for building defenses within systems to prevent adverse outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of the systems approach to error reduction.
  • Contrast between the person approach and the systems approach.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of how system analysis can identify error causes.

    • Main Results:

    • The systems approach analyzes the operational environment to find error causes.
    • It emphasizes building system defenses to mitigate the impact of errors.
    • This approach avoids blaming the individual operator.

    Conclusions:

    • The systems approach offers a framework for reducing medical errors by addressing systemic issues.
    • Shifting focus from individual blame to system analysis is crucial for patient safety.
    • Implementing system defenses can prevent errors from leading to adverse events.