Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Causal impressions: predicting when, not just whether.

Michael E Young1, Ester T Rogers, Joshua S Beckmann

  • 1Department of Psychology, Southern Illinois University, Mailcode 6502, Carbondale, IL 62901-6502, USA. meyoung@siu.edu

Memory & Cognition
|July 21, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Neurobehavioral differences in value-based decision making between people with cocaine use disorder and controls.

Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology·2026
Same author

Video game engines as the new "virtual" Skinner box.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2026
Same author

Exercise Improves Alzheimer's Disease Phenotype in the TgF344-AD Rat, a Behavioral Time Course Study of Males and Females.

Brain sciences·2025
Same author

Maximizing within-session stability in individual differences during an experiential impulsivity task.

Learning & behavior·2025
Same author

Early adolescent second-generation antipsychotic exposure produces long-term, post-treatment increases in body weight and metabolism-associated gene expression.

Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior·2024
Same author

Effects of isolation stress and voluntary ethanol exposure during adolescence on ethanol and nicotine co-use in adulthood using male rats.

Drug and alcohol dependence reports·2024
Same journal

Music enhances associative generalization: Evidence from a memory integration task.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Video, text, and memory: An emotional verbal overshadowing effect.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Limited protective effects of multilingualism against age-related cognitive decline.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Validation of illustrated texts: Can pictures raise awareness of inconsistencies?

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

4I remember (and forget) your happy smiling face: Directed forgetting of emotionally expressive faces of in-group and out-group members.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Identity in the spotlight: Matching faces without overlapping features.

Memory & cognition·2026
See all related articles

Understanding causality involves predicting not just if an event happens, but also when. This study shows spatial and temporal contiguity cues enhance predictions of event timing, crucial for causal inference.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Perception
  • Causal Inference

Background:

  • David Hume's cues to causality (1739) are experimentally supported but their utility remains unclear.
  • Covariation predicts event occurrence but not timing.
  • Predicting event timing is essential for understanding causality.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the role of spatial and temporal contiguity in predicting the timing of effects.
  • To determine if these cues complement covariation in causal inference.

Main Methods:

  • Participants observed Michotte's launching effect paradigm.
  • Accuracy and precision in predicting the onset of movement were measured.
  • Auditory cues were manipulated to bridge delayed launches.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Spatial and temporal contiguity significantly improved prediction accuracy and precision.
  • Auditory cues bridging delays also enhanced causal ratings and predictability.
  • These findings highlight the importance of temporal prediction in causal judgments.

Conclusions:

  • Spatial and temporal contiguity are vital for predicting when an effect will occur.
  • Predicting both whether and when an effect occurs is fundamental to everyday causal inference.
  • This research refines our understanding of how humans perceive causality.