Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Motor preparation in a memorised delay task.

Kimberlee Jordan1, Brian I Hyland, Jeffery R Wickens

  • 1Motor Control Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, Penn State University, University Park, PA 16802-3408, USA.

Experimental Brain Research
|July 21, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Spatially heterogeneous acetylcholine dynamics in the striatum promote behavioral flexibility.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Cholinergic interneurons of the dorsomedial striatum mediate winner-loser effects on social hierarchy dynamics in male mice.

iScience·2025
Same author

Absolute Number of Thalamic Parafascicular and Striatal Cholinergic Neurons, and the Three-Dimensional Spatial Array of Striatal Cholinergic Neurons, in the Sprague-Dawley Rat.

The Journal of comparative neurology·2025
Same author

Multimodal convergence in the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus: Motor, sensory and theta-frequency inputs influence activity of single neurons.

The European journal of neuroscience·2024
Same author

Phasic dopamine signals are reduced in the spontaneously hypertensive rat and increased by methylphenidate.

The European journal of neuroscience·2024
Same author

Acetylcholine waves and dopamine release in the striatum.

Nature communications·2023

Remembering target locations significantly increased reaction time (RT) and movement time (MT). This indicates that memory load impacts motor preparation and potentially movement execution during cognitive tasks.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Motor Control
  • Human Factors

Background:

  • Reaction time (RT) and movement time (MT) are key metrics in understanding human motor performance.
  • Cognitive load, particularly memory demands, can influence the efficiency of motor preparation and execution.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of remembering target locations on RT and MT.
  • To determine if memory load affects motor preparation and movement execution.

Main Methods:

  • 18 participants performed a reaching task involving a memorized delay or a non-memorized delay condition.
  • Participants moved their index finger to a cued target after a variable foreperiod.
  • RT and MT were measured in response to a go signal.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Both RT and MT were significantly longer in the memorized delay task compared to the non-memorized delay task.
  • The increased RT suggests a higher cognitive load on motor preparation when memory is required.

Conclusions:

  • Remembering target locations imposes a significant cognitive load, delaying motor preparation.
  • The increase in MT suggests that movement execution may be planned during the motor preparation phase when memory is involved.