Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Performance of floating absolute risks.

Patrick G Arbogast¹

¹Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232-2158, USA. patrick.arbogast@vanderbilt.edu

American Journal of Epidemiology

|July 22, 2005

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Patient safety in the era of the 80-hour workweek.

Journal of surgical education·2014

Same author

60-Hz frequency effect on gait in Parkinson's disease with subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation.

Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society·2013

Same author

Reducing blood culture contamination in the emergency department: an interrupted time series quality improvement study.

Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine·2013

Same author

Nearly complete elimination of the 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine serotypes in Tennessee.

The Pediatric infectious disease journal·2013

Same author

Initiation of tumor necrosis factor α antagonists and risk of fractures in patients with selected rheumatic and autoimmune diseases.

Arthritis care & research·2013

Same author

Increasing use of atypical antipsychotics and anticonvulsants during pregnancy.

Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety·2012

Same journal

Correction to: Home dampness and molds and occurrence of respiratory tract infections in the first 27 years of life: the Espoo Cohort Study.

American journal of epidemiology·2026

Same journal

A SIMPLE AND POWERFUL TEST OF VACCINE WANING.

American journal of epidemiology·2026

Same journal

Association Between maternal body mass index, offspring growth and pubertal timing: results from a longitudinal birth cohort study.

American journal of epidemiology·2026

Same journal

Correction to: Developing a novel algorithm to identify incident and prevalent dementia in Medicare claims-the ARIC Study.

American journal of epidemiology·2026

Same journal

RE: advancing observational research on arts and health: theory-informed approaches using the RADIANCE framework.

American journal of epidemiology·2026

Same journal

Maternal Cesarean Section and Offspring ASD or ADHD Risk: A Nurses' Health Study II Analysis.

American journal of epidemiology·2026

See all related articles

Floating absolute risks (FARs) can lead to inaccurate confidence intervals in medical studies. Incorrect application of FARs, compared to conventional methods, produces confidence intervals that are too narrow, impacting risk assessment.

Area of Science:

Biostatistics
Epidemiology
Medical Research Methodology

Background:

The "floating absolute risks" (FARs) method is used for calculating confidence intervals for relative hazards in medical studies, including those on hormone replacement therapy and breast cancer risk.
The FAR method has faced controversy due to issues with its correct implementation and reporting.
A lack of direct comparison exists between the incorrectly applied FAR method and conventional approaches for confidence interval calculation in proportional hazards regression.

Purpose of the Study:

To directly compare the FAR method, particularly when incorrectly applied, with the conventional approach for computing confidence intervals from proportional hazards regression.
To evaluate the impact of incorrect FAR method application on the accuracy of confidence intervals in medical research.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

The study employed simulation results to compare the FAR method with the conventional approach for calculating confidence intervals.
The simulations specifically assessed the FAR method under conditions of incorrect application and reporting.

Main Results:

The FAR method, when applied incorrectly, was demonstrated to produce confidence intervals that are substantially too narrow.
This narrowing of confidence intervals by the incorrectly applied FAR method can lead to misleading conclusions regarding statistical significance and effect sizes.

Conclusions:

Incorrect application of the FAR method poses a significant risk of generating inaccurate and overly precise confidence intervals in medical research.
Researchers should exercise caution when using the FAR method and ensure its correct implementation to avoid biased results in studies of relative hazards.