Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 16, 2026

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
Published on: May 15, 2020
Validation of using EMS dispatch codes to identify low-acuity patients
Manish N Shah1, Paul Bishop, E Brooke Lerner
1Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine & Dentistry, Rochester, New York, USA. manish_shah@urmc.rochester.edu
Objective:
To validate the predictive ability of previously derived emergency medical services (EMS) dispatch codes to identify patients with low-acuity illnesses.
Methods:
This prospective descriptive study was conducted in Rochester, New York. An expert panel reviewed and modified a previously derived set of low-priority EMS dispatch codes. Patients assigned these 21 codes between July 2002 and June 2003 were included for further analysis. Dispatch data and level of EMS care were recorded for each dispatch code. The proportion of low-acuity patients (i.e., those who received only basic life support (BLS) care or those who were not transported using lights and sirens) was determined using previously established definitions. Codes were defined as associated with low-acuity patients if the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval (CI) exceeded 90%. Medical records for patients identified as high-acuity were reviewed to evaluate whether the advanced life support (ALS) level care that was provided had a clinical impact.
Results:
Emergency medical services cared for 43,602 patients during the study, and 7,540 were dispatched as low-priority. We found that 7,197 (95%; 95% CI: 95-96%) of these patients met low-acuity criteria and that 11 of the evaluated codes were validated, with low-acuity care provided at least 90% of the time. Of the 343 patients identified as high-acuity, 62 (18%; 95% CI: 14-23%) were determined to have received interventions that had a clinical impact.
Conclusions:
This study prospectively validates 11 EMS dispatch codes as being associated with low-acuity patients. These codes could be used to triage EMS patients based on dispatch information.
Related Concept Videos
Methods of Documentation VII: EMR
Standards of Care I
Types of Reports III: Telephone and Verbal Reports
Here's an overview of each type:
Telephone Orders
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Guidelines for Nursing Documentation II
Timely documentation is crucial to ensure continuity of care for patients. Any delays in recording or reporting medical information can result in medical errors and even adverse patient outcomes. From medication administration to diagnostic test results, every detail must be accurately and promptly documented to provide the best possible care for patients.
Guidelines for Nursing Documentation I
Factual:
The following points emphasize the significance of upholding accurate and unbiased documentation in healthcare.