Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

X-ray Dose Reduction through Adaptive Exposure in Fluoroscopic Imaging
Published on: September 11, 2011
Quality assurance challenges in X-ray emission based analyses, the advantage of digital signal processing
T Papp1, A T Papp, J A Maxwell
1Cambridge Scientific, 175 Elizabeth Street, Guelph, ON, N1E 2X5, Canada. info@cambridgescientific.net
Abstract:
There is a large scatter in the results of X-ray analysis with solid-state detectors suggesting methodological origin. In order to improve the methodology, detector response functions have been investigated by many researchers and analysts. This was necessary as the departure of the response function of some detector-signal processing electronics from the normally assumed Gaussian line shape can exceed 100% in area. Several detector models have been proposed to improve understanding and establish a firm basis for quantitative work. After reviewing some contradictory results, we describe a signal processor that offers quality assurance, by producing two spectra for each measurement. One is the normal spectrum of accepted events, while the second spectrum contains all of the rejected events. For each measurement, therefore, all X-ray events are recorded, enabling quality control. In addition to this improvement, the digital signal processor of Cambridge Scientific, Canada, delivers a high throughput rate, excellent resolution, decreased low energy tailing and a line shape justified by the physics of the detector. Comparative measurements are presented to demonstrate the improved rejection of background from gamma rays as well as a significant improvement in pile-up recognition. The rejected events spectrum gives insight into the origin of the response function, which suggests that the flat plateau of the frequently used Hypermet function, normally attributed to detector dead layers, originates from pile-up with the low energy noise events. A detailed analysis demonstrates how the relative intensities of the X-ray lines can change in a varying noise environment, thus potentially explaining the unacceptable large scatter in the experimental data currently found in the literature. The comparison of the accepted and rejected events adds the possibility of monitoring the electronic efficiency of signal recognition that has generally been ignored in this field.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
X-ray Imaging
Atomic Emission Spectroscopy: Instrumentation
Atomic Emission Spectroscopy: Interference
Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectroscopy: Instrumentation
There are three main types of inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES) instruments: sequential, simultaneous multichannel, and Fourier transform instruments, with the latter being less commonly used.
Atomic Emission Spectroscopy: Lab
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System III: X-Ray
Definition and Purpose
An X-ray, or radiograph, is a non-invasive method that uses ionizing radiation to take images of internal structures. It is mainly used in cardiac imaging to examine the heart, lungs, and major blood vessels, aiming to identify abnormalities in the heart's size, shape, and position, such as heart failure, congenital defects, and vascular...

