Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

A physician's exposure to defamation.

W J Mandell

    Quality Assurance and Utilization Review : Official Journal of the American College of Utilization Review Physicians
    |January 1, 1992
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    A middle ground for physical exams.

    Postgraduate medicine·1999
    Same author

    An approach to the impaired physician.

    Physician executive·1994
    Same author

    Sometimes we're our own worst enemies.

    Physician executive·1992
    Same journal

    On the relations between law and quality improvement practice.

    Quality assurance and utilization review : official journal of the American College of Utilization Review Physicians·1992
    Same journal

    Green Spring criteria for medical necessity of outpatient treatment and its use in a mental health utilization review program.

    Quality assurance and utilization review : official journal of the American College of Utilization Review Physicians·1992
    Same journal

    Measurement of dollar value of services in a capitated dental plan.

    Quality assurance and utilization review : official journal of the American College of Utilization Review Physicians·1992
    Same journal

    Potential conflicts of interest in the delivery of medical services: an analysis of the situation and a proposal.

    Quality assurance and utilization review : official journal of the American College of Utilization Review Physicians·1992
    Same journal

    Quality assessment in the medical intensive care unit. Continued evolution of a data model.

    Quality assurance and utilization review : official journal of the American College of Utilization Review Physicians·1992
    Same journal

    American Hospital Association policy positions.

    Quality assurance and utilization review : official journal of the American College of Utilization Review Physicians·1992
    See all related articles
    JoVE
    x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
    ABOUT JoVE
    OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
    AUTHORS
    Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
    LIBRARIANS
    TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
    RESEARCH
    JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
    EDUCATION
    JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
    Terms & Conditions of Use
    Privacy Policy
    Policies

    This article clarifies defamation law for physicians, offering guidance on avoiding legal actions and outlining defenses. It encourages participation in peer review by assuring protection when acting truthfully and in good faith.

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Law
    • Professional Ethics

    Background:

    • Defamation poses legal risks for physicians.
    • Understanding defamation is crucial for professional practice and peer review.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To define defamation and its implications for medical professionals.
    • To provide strategies for avoiding defamation claims.
    • To outline defenses against defamation actions.

    Main Methods:

    • Review of legal principles of defamation.
    • Analysis of case examples relevant to physicians.
    • Discussion of the duty to speak and its nuances.

    Main Results:

    • Physicians can face liability in various defamation scenarios.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Clear guidelines exist for responding to potential defamation issues.
  • Truthful or good-faith statements in peer review are protected.

    • Conclusions:

    • Physicians can engage in peer review without undue fear of defamation lawsuits.
    • Knowledge of defamation law empowers physicians to practice confidently.