Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 16, 2026

Treatment with Locking Intramedullary Nailing for Intertrochanteric Fracture of the Femur Utilizing a New Awl with a Distal Positioner
Published on: June 6, 2025
Locking versus nonlocking T-plates for dorsal and volar fixation of dorsally comminuted distal radius fractures: a
Corey Trease1, Terence McIff, E Bruce Toby
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kansas University Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA.
Purpose:
To see if locking volar plates approach the strength of dorsal plates on a dorsally comminuted distal radius fracture model. Volar plates have been associated with fewer tendon complications than dorsal plates but are thought to have mechanical disadvantages in dorsally comminuted distal radius fractures. Locking plates may increase construct strength and stiffness. This study compares dorsal and volar locking and nonlocking plates in a dorsally comminuted distal radius fracture model.
Methods:
Axial loading was used to test 14 pairs of embalmed radii after an osteotomy simulating dorsal comminution and plating in 1 of 4 configurations: a standard nonlocking 3.5-mm compression T-plate or a 3.5-mm locking compression T-plate applied either dorsally or volarly. Failure was defined as the point of initial load reduction caused by bone breakage or substantial plate bending.
Results:
No significant differences in stiffness or failure strength were found between volar locked and nonlocked constructs. Although not significant, the stiffness of dorsal locked constructs was 51% greater than that of the nonlocked constructs. Locked or nonlocked dorsal constructs were more than 2 times stiffer than volar constructs. The failure strength of dorsal constructs was 53% higher than that of volar constructs. Failure for both volar locked and nonlocked constructs occurred by plate bending through the unfilled hole at the osteotomy site. Failure for both dorsal locked and nonlocked constructs occurred by bone breakage.
Conclusions:
Locking plates failed to increase the stiffness or strength of dorsally comminuted distal radius fractures compared with nonlocking plates. Failure strength and stiffness are greater for locked or nonlocked dorsal constructs than for either locked or nonlocked volar constructs. Whether the lower stiffness and failure strength are of clinical significance is unknown. The unfilled hole at the site of comminution or osteotomy is potentially a site of weakness in both volar locked and nonlocked plates.
More Related Videos
07:41An Intramedullary Locking Nail for Standardized Fixation of Femur Osteotomies to Analyze Normal and Defective Bone Healing in Mice
Published on: November 13, 2016
11:21Development of a Novel Internal Fixation Model for Rat Radial Fractures: Fracture Healing Assessment and Dorsal Root Ganglion Isolation
Published on: March 13, 2026