Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Costs and effects of chlamydial screening: dynamic versus static modeling.

Robert Welte1, Maarten Postma, Reiner Leidl

  • 1Institute of Health Economics and Health Care Management, GSF-National Research Center for Environment and Health, Neuherberg, Germany. robi.welte@gsf.de

Sexually Transmitted Diseases
|July 26, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Facilitators and barriers to blood and blood product accessibility and use in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review.

Frontiers in health services·2026
Same author

EU-HTA-Why Do Words Matter?

Journal of market access & health policy·2026
Same author

Lymph node surgery and CDK4/6 inhibitors in early breast cancer: a pooled analysis from five randomised trials.

The Lancet. Oncology·2026
Same author

Potential Public Health and Economic Impact of the Next-Generation COVID-19 Vaccine mRNA-1283 in The Netherlands.

Vaccines·2026
Same author

Economic evaluation of combination vaccines: Enabling a more comprehensive assessment of their benefits and challenges.

Vaccine·2026
Same author

Guidelines on reporting and assessing dynamic mathematical models of infectious diseases: a scoping review.

BMC infectious diseases·2025
Same journal

Doxycycline post-exposure prophylaxis may dramatically reduce syphilis among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men: a modeling study.

Sexually transmitted diseases·2026
Same journal

MEASURING DOXYPEP USE RELATIVE TO STI RATES AT A SAN FRANCISCO STI CLINIC REVEALS RACIAL INEQUITIES IN DISEASE PREVENTION IMPACT.

Sexually transmitted diseases·2026
Same journal

Validation of diagnostic codes for identifying chlamydial infections from TriNetX electronic health record data in the United States.

Sexually transmitted diseases·2026
Same journal

Strategies to Support PrEP Implementation: A National Programmatic Experience in Sexually Transmitted Infection Clinics.

Sexually transmitted diseases·2026
Same journal

Contribution of ParC -and GyrA- mutations to fluoroquinolone treatment failures in Mycoplasma genitalium: a systematized review.

Sexually transmitted diseases·2026
Same journal

Sequential sex practices and the likelihood of bacterial sexually transmitted infections and urethritis in men who have sex with women.

Sexually transmitted diseases·2026
See all related articles

Dynamic models offer a more accurate economic evaluation for chlamydia screening programs compared to static models. These dynamic models better capture infection dynamics, leading to different cost-effectiveness findings for public health interventions.

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Health Economics
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • Asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis infections pose a significant public health challenge.
  • Economic evaluations are crucial for optimizing screening program strategies.
  • The choice of modeling type can influence the outcomes of economic evaluations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the impact of different modeling approaches on the economic assessment of chlamydia screening.
  • To compare dynamic (stochastic network simulation) and static (decision analysis) models in cost-effectiveness analysis.

Main Methods:

  • A stochastic network simulation model (dynamic) was compared with a decision analysis model (static).
  • Cost-effectiveness of an opportunistic screening program was estimated using both models.

Related Experiment Videos

  • The study investigated model influence on data requirements, results, and parameter sensitivity.

    • Main Results:

    • Dynamic modeling produced different cost-effectiveness ratios and identified alternative optimal screening strategies compared to static modeling.
    • Dynamic models account for changes in infection rates resulting from screening interventions.
    • Dynamic models are more complex, require more data and time, and are more sensitive to certain parameters.

    Conclusions:

    • Dynamic models are recommended for economic evaluations of interventions that can reduce infection rates, such as large-scale chlamydia screening.
    • The choice of model is critical for accurately assessing the economic impact of public health programs.