Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Informed consent in Canada: an empirical study.

G B Robertson1

  • 1Faculty of Law, University of Alberta, Canada.

Osgoode Hall Law Journal
|April 1, 1984
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Potent inhibition by ropivacaine of metastatic colon cancer SW620 cell invasion and NaV1.5 channel function.

British journal of anaesthesia·2014
Same author

Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis-vaginal fistula: a review.

Diseases of the colon and rectum·2005
Same author

Xenotransplantation: consent, public health and charter issues.

Medical law international·2003
Same author

Ontario's new informed consent law: codification or radical change?

Health law journal·1994
Same author

The efficacy of the medical malpractice system: a Canadian perspective.

Annals of health law·1993
Same author

An autoradiographic search for radioactive particles in the lungs of cigarette smokers.

Archives of environmental health·1980
Same journal

Beyond conception: legal determinations of filiation in the context of assisted reproductive technologies.

Osgoode Hall law journal·2006
Same journal

"Pro-life" absolutes, feminist challenges: the fundamentalist narrative of Irish abortion law 1986-1992.

Osgoode Hall law journal·2005
Same journal

Euthanasia and assisted suicide in the post-Rodriguez era: lessons from foreign jurisdictions.

Osgoode Hall law journal·2003
Same journal

Testing the limits of freedom of contract: the commercialization of reproductive materials and services.

Osgoode Hall law journal·1994
Same journal

Medical, ethical and legal considerations of electroconvulsive therapy.

Osgoode Hall law journal·1984
Same journal

Consent to medical treatment in Canada.

Osgoode Hall law journal·1981
See all related articles

Canadian doctors show low awareness of the landmark Reibl v. Hughes decision impacting informed consent law. This study reveals significant gaps in understanding legal obligations and patient risk disclosure practices.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Law
  • Informed Consent
  • Medical Ethics

Background:

  • The Reibl v. Hughes case significantly reshaped informed consent law in Canada.
  • The legal implications for the Canadian medical profession were expected to be substantial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the Canadian medical profession's awareness of the Reibl v. Hughes decision.
  • To examine doctors' current perceptions and opinions on patient risk disclosure.

Main Methods:

  • The study surveyed Canadian doctors regarding their knowledge of the Reibl v. Hughes ruling.
  • Analysis of doctors' views on disclosing medical risks to patients.

Main Results:

  • A significant portion of Canadian doctors are unaware of the Reibl v. Hughes decision and its importance.
Keywords:
Empirical ApproachLegal ApproachProfessional Patient RelationshipReibl v. Hughes

Related Experiment Videos

  • The study identified concerning gaps in doctors' understanding and reception of key legal precedents.
  • Findings raise questions about current practices in patient risk disclosure.

    • Conclusions:

    • The Canadian medical profession demonstrates a low level of awareness regarding the Reibl v. Hughes decision.
    • There are critical deficiencies in both knowledge and application of informed consent law among Canadian doctors.
    • Further education and policy initiatives are needed to address awareness and reception of legal rulings in medical practice.