Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Automated external defibrillators: to what extent does the algorithm delay CPR?

Thomas D Rea1, Sachita Shah, Peter J Kudenchuk

  • 1Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. rea123@u.washington.edu

Annals of Emergency Medicine
|July 28, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Electrocardiography and Health Records to Predict Cardiac Arrest.

JACC. Advances·2026
Same author

Prediction of shock-refractory ventricular fibrillation in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: external validation of an ECG-based approach.

Resuscitation·2026
Same author

First responder airway and compression rate cluster randomized controlled trial: rational and design.

Resuscitation plus·2026
Same author

Incessant versus recurrent refractory ventricular fibrillation: classification and prognosis in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Resuscitation·2026
Same author

Intraosseous and intravenous vascular access during adult cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Resuscitation·2026
Same author

Wolf Creek XVIII Part 3: Innovations in Defibrillation Science.

Resuscitation plus·2026
Same journal

Variation in Emergency Department Experience With Pediatric Critical Illness.

Annals of emergency medicine·2026
Same journal

Point-of-Care Ultrasound-Guided Hydrostatic Reduction of Ileocolic Intussusception in the Pediatric Emergency Department.

Annals of emergency medicine·2026
Same journal

Managing Diabetic Ketoacidosis.

Annals of emergency medicine·2026
Same journal

Needle Thoracostomy: Implications of Chest Wall Thickness for Anatomical Location and Needle Length.

Annals of emergency medicine·2026
Same journal

Women Emergency Physicians and Gender Disparities from Entry to Advancement.

Annals of emergency medicine·2026
Same journal

Policy Statements Approved March 2026.

Annals of emergency medicine·2026
See all related articles

Immediate post-shock pulse checks and stacked shocks rarely restore a pulse in cardiac arrest. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) initiation is delayed, highlighting a need for improved resuscitation protocols.

Area of Science:

  • Emergency Medicine
  • Cardiology
  • Critical Care

Background:

  • Maximizing cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is crucial for improving survival rates during resuscitation.
  • Current resuscitation protocols involve up to three defibrillation shocks followed by a pulse check.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of rhythm reanalyses, stacked shocks, and post-shock pulse checks in achieving a pulse and initiating CPR.
  • To assess the impact of these interventions on patient outcomes in cardiac arrest.

Main Methods:

  • An observational study was conducted on patients experiencing ventricular fibrillation treated by emergency medical services (EMS).
  • Data were collected from EMS, dispatch, and hospital records, along with automatic external defibrillator (AED) recordings.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis focused on defibrillation success, pulse return, and time to CPR initiation.

    • Main Results:

    • AEDs terminated ventricular fibrillation in 83.6% with the initial shock, and additional shocks were required in some cases.
    • Pulse return was detected in 21.8% after the initial shock and 10.7% after stacked shocks.
    • A pulse was detected during the initial post-shock check in only 2.5% of all cases, with CPR initiation delayed by a median of 29 seconds.

    Conclusions:

    • Rhythm reanalyses, stacked shocks, and post-shock pulse checks demonstrate low efficacy in achieving or detecting a return of pulse.
    • Significant delays in initiating CPR after defibrillation attempts were observed.
    • Current protocols may need revision to optimize pulse detection and timely CPR initiation for better cardiac arrest outcomes.